Relativity for Poets: A Free eBook

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bcrowell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Relativity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a newly created general education course titled "Relativity for Poets," which aims to introduce students, particularly those from non-scientific backgrounds, to Einstein's theory of relativity. Participants share their thoughts on the course's concept, the teaching experience, and the accompanying lecture notes that have been transformed into a free eBook.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their experience teaching the course and the selection of texts used, noting the enjoyment derived from teaching a self-selected group of students.
  • Another participant expresses interest in the course concept and compliments the explanations found in the lecture notes, suggesting that innovative teaching methods contribute to job satisfaction.
  • A later reply discusses the phrase "good for you," referencing its interpretation in urban dictionaries and suggesting that it can be perceived differently depending on context.
  • Another participant questions the appropriateness of using urban dictionary as a reference, comparing it to citing less reputable sources in academic discussions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the positive aspects of the course and the teaching experience. However, there is a disagreement regarding the appropriateness of certain references, particularly urban dictionary, indicating a divergence in perspectives on acceptable sources.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the audience's familiarity with the course content and the humor in the title may not be universally understood. The discussion also reflects varying standards for acceptable references in academic contexts.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in innovative teaching methods, those exploring the intersection of humanities and sciences, and educators looking for creative course ideas may find this discussion relevant.

bcrowell
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
6,723
Reaction score
431
Last semester I got my first opportunity to teach a new gen ed course that I'd created, titled Relativity for Poets. (The word "poets" in the title is a joke, which it turns out a lot of people don't get. There was no actual poetry in the course!) It was a ton of fun, because I got a group of students who were highly self-selected -- it takes an unusual history major to say, "Hey, it sounds like fun to learn about Einstein's theory of relativity!" The required texts were Takeuchi, An Illustrated Guide to Relativity, Stannard, Relativity: A Very Short Introduction, and Ostriker and Mitton, Heart of Darkness. In addition, I wrote up my own set of lecture notes, which I've now finished putting into the form of the first draft of a book. The book is a free download.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: martinbn and ShayanJ
Physics news on Phys.org
The idea of such a course is interesting.
Also I glanced through your lecture notes. It seems to me you have interesting and fun explanations there.
Anyway, from your posts, it seems to me that you're having fun with your job as a teacher. Its really part of having a happy life to be able to have such innovations in your job and enjoy your job by playing with it from time to time. Good for you.

P.S.
I checked an urban dictionary, and here it says "good for you" is mostly not a phrase when you're happy for someone and is mostly rude. But I think you can say that's not what I meant!:biggrin:
 
Last edited:
Shyan said:
I checked an urban dictionary, and here it says "good for you" is mostly not a phrase when you're happy for someone and is mostly rude

Not at all, it's a fine phrase! :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ShayanJ
Shyan said:
I checked an urban dictionary

I strongly suspect this would not be considered an acceptable reference here on PF. :wink: Kind of like citing a paper from vixra instead of arxiv...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nugatory and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
38K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
13K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
62
Views
56K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
55K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
13K