Undergrad Relativity of Simultaneity: An Overview

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relativity of simultaneity in Special Relativity, specifically how synchronized clocks in one reference frame (S) appear out of sync in another moving frame (S'). An observer in S' calculates a non-zero time difference between the clocks, which raises questions about the effectiveness of Lorentz transformations in reconciling these observations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the Lorentz transformation, including the direction of velocity, to accurately assess time differences. The participants suggest revisiting the transformation with the correct sign for velocity to resolve the confusion. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the implications of simultaneity in different reference frames.
wildebeest44
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
I recently started studying Special Relativity an my book discusses the following:

Say I have synchronized two separated clocks in a reference frame S, if then an observer in another reference frame S' for whom the clocks are moving sees the clocks he would say those clocks are out of synchronization for him, as for him the light that was used to sync the clocks reaches one of them before the other.

Up to this point, I think I understand what is happening, but if then the observer in S' knowing about the relativity of simultaneity applies a Lorentz transformation to try and "see" the clocks as an observer in S would, it will, nevertheless, still find a non-zero difference between the times "shown" by the clocks, proportional to the distance separating them.

What does this mean?
Isn't the Lorentz transformation an attempt to find the space and time coordinates as they would be seen from other reference frames, and if so, why is it unsuccessful here?

What's the physical interpretation of the difference in time the observer in S' just found, considering is neither the difference he sees from his reference frame or the one seen by the original observer in S?

Thank you, and excuse me for not showing the math I don't how to write it here in a readable way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

This is difficult to answer without the maths. Just below the reply box there's a link to how to use LaTeX for maths. An example: $$x'=\gamma (x-vt) $$ Reply to my post to see how it's done.

An obvious guess is that if you transformed from S to S' using v=u, did you transform from S' back to S using v=u (wrong) or v=-u (right)? If that's not it have a read of the LaTeX link and post what you did. Then we can help without guessing. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes wildebeest44
Ibix said:
Welcome to PF.

This is difficult to answer without the maths. Just below the reply box there's a link to how to use LaTeX for maths. An example: $$x'=\gamma (x-vt) $$ Reply to my post to see how it's done.

An obvious guess is that if you transformed from S to S' using v=u, did you transform from S' back to S using v=u (wrong) or v=-u (right)? If that's not it have a read of the LaTeX link and post what you did. Then we can help without guessing. :wink:

I just saw the guide, thanks, i'll give it a try.

So, suppose that clocks are placed in ##x_1## and ##x_2##, in S they are in sync so,
## \Delta t=0 ##

However in S', which is moving with speed u relative to S, we have for each clock
##t_1'=\gamma(t_1-\frac{u}{c^2}x_1) ##
##t_2'=\gamma(t_2-\frac{u}{c^2}x_2) ##
then for this observer the time interval between them is
##\Delta t' = t_2'-t_1'=\gamma(\Delta t - \frac{u}{c^2}\Delta x) ##
with ## \Delta t=0 ## because the clocks are in sync in S, then
##\Delta t' =- \gamma \frac{u}{c^2}\Delta x ##
Therefore, the clocks are out of sync for the observer in S'. But if I now tried to apply
##\Delta t'=\gamma \Delta t##
I would get
##\Delta t=-\frac{u}{c^2}\Delta x ##
Which is different to 0. This is the result I find troubling.

Thanks for your reply, I hope is clearer now :)
 
  • Like
Likes Dale
wildebeest44 said:
But if I now tried to apply
##\Delta t'=\gamma \Delta t##
I would get
##\Delta t=-\frac{u}{c^2}\Delta x ##
Which is different to 0. This is the result I find troubling.
Try the Lorentz transform again, but reversing the sign of ##u##. Don't just use the time dilation formula.
 
MOVING CLOCKS In this section, we show that clocks moving at high speeds run slowly. We construct a clock, called a light clock, using a stick of proper lenght ##L_0##, and two mirrors. The two mirrors face each other, and a pulse of light bounces back and forth betweem them. Each time the light pulse strikes one of the mirrors, say the lower mirror, the clock is said to tick. Between successive ticks the light pulse travels a distance ##2L_0## in the proper reference of frame of the clock...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
922
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K