Relativity Question with Lorentz tranformations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the time interval and distance between two flashes of light as observed from two different frames of reference using Lorentz transformations. Observer O sees a red flash at the origin and a blue flash at 3.26 km after 7.63 microseconds. Observer O', moving at 0.625c, calculates the time interval t' as 1.73 microseconds but encounters discrepancies in calculating the distance x', which should yield -1.90 km according to the textbook. Participants agree that the textbook's answers are likely incorrect due to inconsistencies in the spacetime interval calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations
  • Familiarity with spacetime intervals
  • Knowledge of the speed of light (c) and its implications in relativity
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Lorentz transformation equations in detail
  • Learn about spacetime intervals and their significance in relativity
  • Explore the implications of relative motion on time dilation and length contraction
  • Review examples of relativistic problems involving multiple observers
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying special relativity, educators teaching relativity concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the effects of relative motion on time and space measurements.

sr6622
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Observer O sees a red flash of light at the origin at t=0 and a blue flash of light at x = 3.26km at a time t = 7.63 [tex]\mu[/tex] seconds. What are the distance and the time interval between the flasheds according to ovserver O', who moes relative to O in the direction of increasing x with a speed of 0.625c? Assume that the origins of the two coordinate systems line up at t = t' = 0.

Homework Equations



x' = [tex]\gamma[/tex](x - ut)

t' = [tex]\gamma[/tex]t - (u/c^2)x



The Attempt at a Solution



I solved for t' and got the answer 1.73 [tex]\mu[/tex]seconds. From the back of my textbook, this seems to be the correct answer.

When I put x = 3.26km into the first equation above, I always get the answer to be 2.34 km. The answer fromt the back of my textbook says [tex]\Delta[/tex] x' = -1.90 km.

I'm wondering what I'm doing wrong...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just to make it a little clearer, this equation should be written

t' = [tex]\gamma[/tex][t - (u/c^2)x]



I solved for t' and got the answer 1.73 [tex]\mu[/tex]seconds. From the back of my textbook, this seems to be the correct answer.

When I put x = 3.26km into the first equation above, I always get the answer to be 2.34 km. The answer fromt the back of my textbook says [tex]\Delta[/tex] x' = -1.90 km.

I'm wondering what I'm doing wrong...

Are you sure you have the answer for the right problem? (I'm hoping they didn't change the numbers in the problem between editions and forget to change the answers -- I've seen that a little too often...)

Something about their answer doesn't seem right because the spacetime interval should be

(delta-s)^2 = (c delta-t)^2 - (delta-x)^2 = (c delta-t')^2 - (delta-x')^2 ,

which doesn't happen with their values.

I have [tex]\gamma[/tex] = 1.2810 . I guess we're agreed that x' = 0 , t' = 0 for the red flash. I also agree with you that, for the blue flash,

x' = (1.281) [ (3.26 km) - (0.625)(300,000 km/sec)(7.63e^-6 sec) ] = 2.343 km .

However, I get

t' = (1.281) [ (7.63e^-6) - (0.625)(3.26 km/300,000 km/sec) ]

= 1.074e^-6 sec or

ct' = 0.322 km.

In O's frame,

(delta-s)^ 2 = [ (300,000 km/sec)(7.63e^-6 - 0 sec) ]^2 - ( 3.26 - 0 km )^2
= -5.388 km^2

A negative space-time separation makes sense because the light-travel time in O's frame from the location of the blue flash is 3.26 km/300,000 km/sec = 10.9 microseconds, which is longer than the time separation between the flashes.

In O' 's frame,

(delta-s)^ 2 = [ (300,000 km/sec)(1.074e^-6 - 0 sec) ]^2 - ( 2.343 - 0 km )^2
= -5.386 km^2 (the difference is likely "round-off" error) .

You do not get this value with the book's answers. Unless we're missing some point about the problem description, I find their answer suspect.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K