Relativity Simultaneity Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a train traveling at a significant fraction of the speed of light (0.5c) and a light flash occurring at its center. The discussion centers on whether the events of a bell ringing at the front of the train and a siren at the back are simultaneous from the perspectives of both a train passenger and an outside observer. The implications of simultaneity in different reference frames are explored.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of simultaneity in different frames of reference, particularly focusing on the passenger's perspective versus that of an outside observer. Questions arise regarding the nature of proper time and the calculations involving Lorentz transformations. There is also a consideration of causality in the context of the events described.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and calculations related to the problem. There is a recognition of the complexities involved in the scenario, particularly regarding the potential violation of causality and the formulation of the problem itself. Some guidance has been offered regarding the calculations and the interpretation of simultaneity.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the unusual formulation of the problem, suggesting that the use of sound (bell and siren) may not be appropriate given the train's speed. There is an underlying assumption that the principles of relativity apply, but the specifics of the scenario raise questions about the validity of certain interpretations.

hy23
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There's a train traveling at 0.5c when a light at the center of the train flashes. When the light reaches the front, it rings a bell. Light reaching the back rings a siren.

Question is: are the bell and siren simultaneous events for a train passenger?

are the bell and siren simultaneous events for an observer outside of the train (i.e. standing beside the track)?

If any of the above are not simultaneous, which event occurs first and by how much time?


Homework Equations



t=t'y



The Attempt at a Solution


I think for the passenger, it should be simultaneous events because in that frame, the light should take the same amount of time to travel to both ends of the train.
For the outside observer, it should appear that the light reaches the back first. But does the train passenger measure proper time or the outside observer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your thinking about the passenger is correct. To answer the second question, note that the outside observer is moving relative to the passenger. So if two events are simultaneous in the train frame, can they also be simultaneous in a frame that is moving relative to the train frame?
 
ok i did the calculations and i said that the the explosion happens at t=0 in the train passenger's frame, using Lorentz transformations I found that from the outside reference frame, the light from explosion reaches the back of the train at a t'<0, and reaches the front at t'>0...(you probably don't need to know the actual values I got, just that one is negative and one is positive), but then this violates causality because the outside observer would see the light reaching the back before the explosion happens?
 
Obviously causality cannot be violated. Assuming that you calculated correctly that the light reaches the back of the train at t' < 0, when (in the outside observer's frame) does the light from the explosion reach the outside observer? Have you done that calculation? If it's before the light reaches the back of the train, you're OK.

I should add that I don't really like the way this problem is formulated, but that's not your fault. Instead of a bell and a siren, there should be flashes of, say, red and blue light at each end. This train is traveling at about Mach 400,000 (absurdly supersonic) so what the outside observer would hear is questionable.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K