Schools Remarks on AP courses in high school

AI Thread Summary
The discussion critiques the proliferation of Advanced Placement (AP) courses in high schools, arguing that they often dilute the quality of education by standardizing advanced instruction and leading to a decline in foundational skills like proof and reasoning in mathematics. It highlights that many students who take AP calculus are inadequately prepared for college-level courses, resulting in high attrition rates in honors classes. The speaker advocates for maintaining rigorous honors courses that emphasize deep analysis and writing over AP courses, which may not adequately prepare students for advanced study. There is a call for innovative, substantive mathematics courses that focus on understanding rather than test performance. Ultimately, the emphasis is on fostering a genuine love for learning and critical thinking skills rather than merely pursuing high GPAs or standardized test scores.
  • #101
On the note of the scores possibly being reported as a straight percentile. Could anyone explain to me why they are scored the way they are? besdies the fact that I guess it spreads out the scores neatly on most tests. And on some tests give you a lot of leway with your mistakes. I think for some tests a percentage grade would make more sense. For example tomorrow I take the AP chemistry exam. Now in theory tht class, and exam tests your knowledge over that would generally be covered in what most colleges call General Chemistry I and II plus their respective labs. Now that is a lot of material. It seems like it would be easier for a school to determine whetehr you are qualified to skip their class based on seing your overall percent score and the test itself. I don't know if they have access to those materials
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #102
I think, it's for two reasons:

1. The actual grades are supposedly determined(in part) by giving the same questions in college classes, and comparing the raw scores from those students with their final grade in the class.
2. Free response changes in difficulty from year to year, so percentiles change also. Standardised grading makes scores comparable year to year.
 
  • #103
I said percentile, not percentage. A percentile is a number that indicates what percent of other test-takers scored lower or higher than you, such as "80th percentile."

Obviously not all courses at all colleges are equal in difficulty or have students who are equal in aptitude. Therefore normalizing the test to a "standard college course" is not legitimate if indeed that is what they do. There is no reason to deliberately toss away data.
 
  • #104
Well, I found the Physics B test somewhat difficult. Let me clarify:

The multiple choice I breezed through — left only about 5 blank, and I was fairly sure of the ones I did fill out, so that wasn't a problem.

The free response questions, a few of them at least, I had to leave totally blank. I cannot discuss the nature of these questions yet, or else the AP guys will hunt me down and burn my test — suffice to say, I had a fair amount of trouble with some of them. Still, I'm fairly sure my score will be high enough to wave a physics 101 class in college next year.
 
  • #105
Lucretius said:
Well, I found the Physics B test somewhat difficult. Let me clarify:

The multiple choice I breezed through — left only about 5 blank, and I was fairly sure of the ones I did fill out, so that wasn't a problem.

The free response questions, a few of them at least, I had to leave totally blank. I cannot discuss the nature of these questions yet, or else the AP guys will hunt me down and burn my test — suffice to say, I had a fair amount of trouble with some of them. Still, I'm fairly sure my score will be high enough to wave a physics 101 class in college next year.
48 hours have passed for me.
So DUDE, wait a sec.
The free-response... the ones I got were like super easy. The first one was like, measuring g and you had a table of d vs. t. The second one was on electricity I think. The third was on reflection/refraction and slit stuff. The fourth was on Thermodynamics. The mechanics question was somewhere in there and one on an electron and a positron and stuff.
If that's the paper you had, I seriously think you were mistaken if you thought it was difficult and the multiple choice was easy... 'cause... well... the multiple choice pretty much raped me. :(
 
  • #106
Pseudo Statistic said:
48 hours have passed for me.
So DUDE, wait a sec.
The free-response... the ones I got were like super easy. The first one was like, measuring g and you had a table of d vs. t. The second one was on electricity I think. The third was on reflection/refraction and slit stuff. The fourth was on Thermodynamics. The mechanics question was somewhere in there and one on an electron and a positron and stuff.
If that's the paper you had, I seriously think you were mistaken if you thought it was difficult and the multiple choice was easy... 'cause... well... the multiple choice pretty much raped me. :(

You got Form B of the free-response questions, from your description. I didn't have any sort of table for section 1. Was this the test you had? Here is the test I took. I didn't think the multiple choice was very hard; the practice multiple choice exams I had taken in class were much more difficult than this years'.

Look at question 3 on my free response section and see if you can tell what they wanted there. I left that whole page blank.
 
  • #107
Lucretius said:
You got Form B of the free-response questions, from your description. I didn't have any sort of table for section 1. Was this the test you had? Here is the test I took. I didn't think the multiple choice was very hard; the practice multiple choice exams I had taken in class were much more difficult than this years'.

Look at question 3 on my free response section and see if you can tell what they wanted there. I left that whole page blank.

on question #3, basically they are asking questions about the electric field generated by those two point charges. Each point charge has an electric field associated with it; the total electric field is the sum of the two fields. Given the charge on one point, you can calculate its contribution to the field; since you know the total field at that point is zero, then you can calculate the field due to the other point and from that calculate the charge.
 
  • #108
Lucretius said:
You got Form B of the free-response questions, from your description. I didn't have any sort of table for section 1. Was this the test you had? Here is the test I took. I didn't think the multiple choice was very hard; the practice multiple choice exams I had taken in class were much more difficult than this years'.

Look at question 3 on my free response section and see if you can tell what they wanted there. I left that whole page blank.
Yup, turns out I did have form B..
On the subject of tests on the website, they released the AP Physics C Mechanics test!
I mean... err... I have the test this Friday, and according to records there has never been an AP Physics C form B. I hope I get lucky. :D
So question 3 from your paper...
Since it says the net electric field at point P is zero, The electric field produced by q1 plus the electric field produced by q2 = 0... so, from there, you can plug in your known values and solve for q2.
Chances are, however, q2 is positive because since q1 is negative, a test charge 1C at point P would be attracted to it, (to the right), so it needs a positive charge, q2, to repel it to the left enough to keep the net electric field 0 at that point I guess.
For part c, the electric force on q2 would be the force on q2 caused by q1, Coulomb's law...
d... Electric potential would be 0 when
q1/4pi*e*d = q2/ 4pi*e*(0.3-d)
And solving for d.. (d would be the distance from q1 to the point)
e... I would integrate the coulomb force from infinity to the point, but I'm not sure if that's acceptable on physics B. You could say, instead, that it's = to the potential energy. I'm not sure why, though.
 
Last edited:
  • #109
Hmm I musta looked at it incorrectly. I meant the one with the graph and they wanted the two pieces of information to be put in. The optics one.
 
  • #110
Oh, then you meant question 4.
For part a) you could basically use snell's law... n1 sin t1 = n2 sin t2.. and since n1 = 1 (air), you're left with:
sint1 = n2 sin t2 or n2 = sin t1 / sin t2
That's what you have to graph to get a linear relationship and thus, from the slope, calculate the index of refraction you need.
For part c, I'm not sure, but I'd guess "The air-oil interface only". (Not sure why though)
For part e there's a formula... 2t = something...
 
  • #111
Pseudo Statistic said:
e... I would integrate the coulomb force from infinity to the point, but I'm not sure if that's acceptable on physics B. You could say, instead, that it's = to the potential energy. I'm not sure why, though.

By the work-energy theorem, the work done on a particle is the change in the energy of the particle (potential energy, in this case) The potential energy of a particle at infinity is zero (because it's infinitely far away from the charges) So bringing a particle in from infinity, the potential energy is equal to the work done.

In AP physics, this is assumed to be true; you can show this using a little calculus 3, stating that since electric fields are conservative, the fundamental theorem of line integrals states the line integral of the field over the smooth curve from infinity to the final point (which is the definition of work) is just the difference between the potential function on the field at the endpoints.
 

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top