Representation of Super-Quantum probability

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the representation of Super-Quantum probability, specifically addressing the lack of a formal mathematical structure for Super-Quantum correlations that violate Tsirelson's bound, as exemplified by PR boxes. Classical probability is framed within measure spaces, while Quantum Probability utilizes Hilbert spaces and operators. The conversation highlights the absence of a comprehensive theory for Super-Quantum correlations, suggesting a gap in the existing literature and prompting further inquiry into potential frameworks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Classical Probability Theory and Measure Spaces
  • Familiarity with Quantum Probability, Hilbert Spaces, and Operators
  • Knowledge of C*-algebras and their duals
  • Awareness of Tsirelson's Bound and PR Boxes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical frameworks for Super-Quantum correlations
  • Explore the implications of Tsirelson's bound in quantum mechanics
  • Study the properties and applications of C*-algebras in quantum theory
  • Examine existing literature on PR boxes and their role in quantum information theory
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in quantum mechanics, theoretical physicists, and mathematicians interested in advanced probability theories and quantum information science.

DarMM
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,369
Reaction score
1,408
Classical probability theory can be represented with measure spaces and functions over them. Quantum Probability is given as the theory of Hilbert spaces and operators over them. Both more abstractly are handled by the theory of C*-algebras and their duals.

However I know of no structure for Super-Quantum Correlations violating Tsirelson's bound, such as those found in PR boxes. I've always seen them presented merely as a matrix of probabilities attached to events, but never seen a general mathematical theory. I was just wondering if there is one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
523
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K