Representations of SU(2) are equivalent to their duals

arg
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi.
I am having trouble proving that the irreducible representations of SU(2) are equivalent to their dual representations.
The reps I am looking at are the spaces of homogenous polynomials in 2 complex variables of degree 2j (where j is 0, 1/2, 1,...). If f is such a polynomial the action of an element g of SU(2) is to take f to
f(g^{-1} \left(<br /> \begin{array}{cc}<br /> x\\<br /> y \end{array}<br /> \right) )
What is the dual space of this set of polynomials and how do you combine an element of the dual space with the original space to get a number?
I can find no proof of the equivalence of a representation with its dual. If anyone has any insight please let me know. Please let me know if I need to clarify anything.
Thanks very much.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That set of polynomials is _just_ a vector space. So write down the obvious basis, hence te dual basis, and now what is the action of SU(2)?
 
Hi Matt. Thanks for your quick reply.

So if the degree of the homogenous polynomials is n the basis is:
x^n, x^{n-1}y, x^{n-2}y^2, ... , xy^{n-1}, y^n so it is an n+1 dimensional vector space.
I guess the dual basis are the n+1 1-forms, the jth of which eats x^ky^{n-k} and spits out 1 if k=j and 0 otherwise.
The way I understand the action of an element g of SU(2) on the polynomial f(x,y) is to take the matrix g^{-1} and multiply it on the right by the column vector \left(\begin{array}(x\\y\end{array} \right). Then you get another column vector. Take the top element of this vector and plug it into the x-slot in f(x,y) and plug the bottom element of the vector into the y-slot. Now if you multiply everything out and regroup the terms you have another homogenous polynomial of degree n.
At this point I have several questions. Is there a way to work with these new polynomials without multiplying everything out by hand? How does one show that the action of g on this space of polynomials is 1-1 and onto? How can I come up with a good map from this space of polynomials to the dual space?

Thanks a lot.
 
The double dual of V is what you started with...
 
I don't follow you. Can you be a bit more specific? Do you mean that the basis I listed is not the basis of the homogeneous polynomials of two complex variables? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top