Requesting Help Regarding the Cause of the Faraday Effect

  • Thread starter Thread starter Archeon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cause Faraday
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the Faraday effect, specifically the change in polarization angle of a linearly polarized wave in a magnetic field. It clarifies that the effect is not due to absorption but rather a difference in the dielectric constant for left circularly polarized (LCP) and right circularly polarized (RCP) light in the presence of a magnetic field. This difference in dielectric constants causes LCP and RCP light to travel at different speeds, resulting in a rotation of the polarization direction. The participant seeks further clarification on the absorption effect and its relation to the phenomenon, as well as why the effect does not reverse when the wave travels in the opposite direction. The explanation emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying physics of the Faraday effect.
Archeon
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone,

I seek help regarding the Faraday-effect (change of the polarization angle of a linearly polarized wave in an electric field). I have asked my professor about the topic and learned a lot, but I think I am still lacking one or some crucial points. Here is how I understand the cause of the effect to date, mind that I might have misheard some of the thing I've been told:

A linearly polarized wave traveling parallel to a magnetic field can be written as the superposition of ##\sigma^+## and ##\sigma^- ## parts. These can be seen as transitions in the energy level diagram of the medium the wave is passing through, with the added constraint that the magnetic quantum number ## m ## must change by ## +1 ## for ## \sigma^+## and ## -1 ## for ##\sigma^-## . The wave parts do not have enough energy for this transition, yet they still experience some "absorption" based on how close to the energy level they are. This effectively causes the wave to travel slower the narrower the gap to the next state is. When a magnetic field is present, the Zeeman effect alters the excited states differently. The gaps for ##\sigma^+## and ##\sigma^- ## are of different height, thus they travel at different speeds, which in turn causes a change in the angle of polarization.

But what is meant by this absorption effect that causes the slowdown, and what does it have to do with absorption? And how does this explain that the effect is not inversed when the wave is traveling in the opposite direction?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Faraday effect is not because of absorption. It is because, in the presence of the magnetic field, the dielectric constant of the material is slightly different for left circularly polarized (LCP) and right circularly polarized (RCP) light. This gives rise to different speeds of LCP and RCP light. when you combine them to get linearly polarized light, you find that the direction of polarization rotates as the beam passes through the medium. The math for this is shown, for example, at: http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node101.html.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top