Residue theorem for real integrals

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the residue theorem to evaluate the integral of cos(x) divided by (x² + 1)² over the interval from -∞ to ∞. The original poster identifies the singularities of the integrand and expresses uncertainty about finding the residues due to the presence of the cosine function in the numerator.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to set up the integral in the complex plane and considers using a closed contour. They express confusion about how to find the residues, particularly due to the cosine function. Other participants suggest methods for calculating residues and confirm the identification of poles.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different methods for calculating residues and confirming the correctness of the original poster's approach regarding the poles. There is a shared inquiry into the applicability of both methods for residue calculation.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions a lack of familiarity with the notation for the integral's limits and expresses uncertainty about expanding the cosine function as a series. There is an implicit assumption that the residue theorem can be applied effectively in this context.

shebbbbo
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
The question asks to show using the residue theorem that

\int cos(x)/(x2+1)2 dx = \pi/e
(the terminals of the integral are -\infty to \infty but i didnt know the code to write that)

I found the singularities at -i and +i

so i think we can then say

\intcos (z) / (z+i)2(z-i)2 dz

and if we take that integral over a closed contour then we will be left with the residue

and i know that once we have found the residue you can multiply this by 2\pii and sum all the residues together.

BUT...

i don't know how to find the residues for this question. the cos on the top line is causing me trouble. maybe i need to expand the cos as a series? but I am not sure

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ive looked on that page and stared at it for ages...

will both methods work? and am i correct with what i have done so far? (ie poles at +i and -i)?
 
shebbbbo said:
ive looked on that page and stared at it for ages...

will both methods work? and am i correct with what i have done so far? (ie poles at +i and -i)?
Yes, both methods will work and you are indeed correct in what you have done so far.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
974
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K