Residues of Poles in Upper Half Plane for $f(z)$

  • Thread starter Thread starter latentcorpse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane Poles
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the residues of the poles in the upper half plane for the function f(z) = ze^(iz) / (z^4 + α^4), where α > 0. Participants explore the nature of the poles and the factorization of the denominator.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the factorization of the denominator and whether the poles are simple or double. There is confusion regarding the number of poles and their locations in the upper half plane. Some participants suggest methods for finding the poles, including using exponential forms and considering the fourth roots of -α^4.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their thoughts on the factorization process and the identification of poles. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of the poles, but there is no explicit consensus on the best approach to proceed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the information they can share. There is an emphasis on understanding the characteristics of the poles and their residues without providing complete solutions.

latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
for the function [itex]f(z)=\frac{ze^{iz}}{z^4+\alpha^4}, \alpha>0[/itex]

what are the residues of the poles in the upper half plane

so i factorised the denominator to [itex](z^2+i \alpha^2)(z^2-i \alpha^2)[/itex]
my problems are:

(i)but then i wasn't sure how to characterise this the z^2 had me confused as to whether these were simple poles or dobule poles?

(ii)also the question said "poleS" in the upper half plane making me think there was more than 1?

(iii) i don't know how to proceed without being able to get the denominator into the form of (z-a)(z-b) or something along those lines

can anybody help me here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Keep factoring (factorizing [sic]). Hint: i=exp(i*pi/2).
 
i get [itex]z^2+i \alpha^2=(z+ie^{\frac{i \pi}{4}} \alpha)(z-ie^\frac{{i \pi}{4}} \alpha)=(z-\alpha)(z+\alpha)[/itex]
so poles at +/-alpha

the other term in the denominator gives poles at +/-i alpha.

so we have four simple poles and then it should be easy to get residues etc.

would there have been an easier way to factorise this that would have avoided dealing with exponentials?
 
latentcorpse said:
i get [itex]z^2+i \alpha^2=(z+ie^{\frac{i \pi}{4}} \alpha)(z-ie^\frac{{i \pi}{4}} \alpha)=(z-\alpha)(z+\alpha)[/itex]
Ahhh, [itex]\alpha[/itex] is NOT equal to [itex]ie^{\frac{i\pi}{4}}\alpha[/itex]. Why would you think it was?
[tex]ie^{\pi/4}= i(\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}+ i\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2})= -\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}+ i\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}[/tex]

so poles at +/-alpha

the other term in the denominator gives poles at +/-i alpha.

so we have four simple poles and then it should be easy to get residues etc.

would there have been an easier way to factorise this that would have avoided dealing with exponentials?
The fourth roots of [itex]-\alpha[/itex] lie on a circle in the complex plane with radius [itex]\alpha^{1/4}[/itex] and center at 0. Since the argument of -1 is [itex]\pi[/itex] the arguments of the fourth roots of [itex]-\alpha[/itex] are [itex]\pi/4[/itex], [itex]3\pi/4[/itex], [itex]5\pi/4[/itex], and [itex]7\pi/4[/itex]. The first two of those are in the upper half plane.
 
my bad. i was still working with [itex]e^{\frac{i \pi}{2}}[/itex] and so just used i*i and i*(-i). a lesson in taking your time. ok so then i just evalueate the residues of simples poles as usual i.e.

now if i let [itex]Q=-\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}+i\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}[/itex] then the residue at Q can be obtained by

[itex]\lim_{z \rightarrow Q} \frac{(z-Q)(ze^{iz})}{z^4+\alpha^4}[/itex] yes?

secondly,
could i also have found the poles by considering the fourth roots of [itex]-\alpha^4[/itex] and using de Moivre then like youy did above? (or would it be the fourth roots of [itex]\alpha^4[/itex] - I'm inclined to go with the first but would like to double check)

thanks.
 
surely multiplying by z-Q on the top is going to leave a whole bunch of crap on the denominator and its going to get very messy!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K