Resistance calculation of odd-shaped plate

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the end-to-end resistance of an irregularly shaped metal plate, specifically a diamond-shaped object. Participants explore various methods and theoretical considerations related to resistance calculations, including both macroscopic and mesoscopic approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that if the object is in the mesoscopic region, it can be treated using Buttiker scattering, while in the macroscopic region, the irregular shape may be negligible.
  • Others argue that calculating the resistance of a diamond-shaped object connected to DC sources is complex and cannot be simplified to basic physics approaches.
  • A participant proposes that an irregular object can be viewed as composed of many regular sub-objects connected in parallel, leading to a resistance calculation through integration of resistivity over varying lengths.
  • Another participant mentions the Van der Pauw method as a general approach for measuring irregular objects.
  • Some participants consider the object as a series of resistors and discuss the implications of current density and potential distribution in relation to the shape and contact points.
  • One participant introduces advanced methods such as conformal mapping and energy variational approaches for calculating resistance, noting the complexity involved.
  • Another suggests using finite-element analysis as a practical approach for solving the resistance problem, emphasizing its non-analytic nature.
  • A later reply questions the linearity of potential distribution in the presence of a long metal band between electrodes, raising concerns about the assumptions underlying Ohm's law in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the complexity of calculating resistance for irregular shapes, with no consensus on a single method or approach. The discussion includes both agreement on the non-trivial nature of the problem and differing opinions on the best methods to use.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the specific geometry of the object, the assumptions made regarding the electric field, and the potential variations in resistance calculations based on different methods proposed by participants.

Roger44
Messages
79
Reaction score
1
Hello
If the resistivity rho and the dimensions are known, any schoolboy can calculate the end-to-end resistance of a strip of metal. But how do you do it if the strip is not regular as in the image?
 

Attachments

  • croquis 6.JPG
    croquis 6.JPG
    1.7 KB · Views: 790
Physics news on Phys.org
If the problem is in the mesoscopic region, the additional piece can be treated as a Buttiker scattering.

If in the macroscopic, one can ignore the additional piece, because it will not affect the current significantly.

The above reply is limited to your model
 
Shawl, it's macroscopic bur forget this example.

Could you consider a diamond shaped object connected to a + and a - DC at each end and just confirm that there is no easy "1960's university physics level" approach to calculating exact end-to-end resistance.
 
Considering that an irregular object is consists of many regular sub-objects which are paralleled connected.

The length of sub-object varies continuously from the shortest length (SL) to a longest length (LL).

The SL is a distance between a+ and a- DC contacts.

The LL in a diamond example is 2*(side length).

the resistivity/unit area for the each sub-object is rho/A. (A is the unit area)

The total resistance is calculated by an integration of a function (rho*L/A) from SL to LL.

This method is also suitable for other irregular shaped objects.

And This will be mathematic problem, but not the physical image.
 
If you want to measure a irregular object.

Generally, we choose the Van der pro method, which is 4 or 5 -terminents measurement.
 
Just looking at the diagram shows that it can be considered as three resistors in series.
 
Roger44 said:
Could you consider a diamond shaped object connected to a + and a - DC at each end and just confirm that there is no easy "1960's university physics level" approach to calculating exact end-to-end resistance.
Not sure where 1960 came from, people were plenty bright in that year! If your question is whether the calculation is non-trivial, then the answer is yes, non-trivial. You can analyze it exactly using conformal mapping, finding the potential and current stream lines in terms of Jacobi elliptic functions. The expression for resistance is then fairly simple, but it does depend on the form of the contact at each end (injecting current at an idealized point located at the diamond's corner creates mathematical difficulty with infinite current density, etc.) Find this in Lawden, Elliptic Functions and Applications. The resistance of flat plates of various irregular shapes can also be calculated approximately using an energy variational approach, as shown by Hammond in Energy Methods in Electromagnetism. I'm sure there are many other references (and approaches). I think none will be trivial.
 
Thanks for your suggestions and I'll read up tonight on you references.

Could you have a look at this figure where the heat (or current) enters along a short length on one side and flows to an equal temp (or potential) on the opposite side.

What approach should be used to resolving this case?

Thanks again
 

Attachments

  • croquis 2.JPG
    croquis 2.JPG
    6.6 KB · Views: 727
The fastest and most practical approach is not analytic at all. Use a finite-element code to solve it. There are many for E&M and for thermal simulations, and at least one (EMAS) that does both in the same package at the same time.
 
  • #10
Good evening

Yes, a non-trivial finite element approach was not on the cursus of Bristol university back in the sixties to my knowledge, whereas slicing up a diamond shape and integrating was six form level. But is it valid? I ask this question for the following reason:

An electric field will exist between any two spaced electrodes. A long metal band placed equally between these two electrodes without contact at either end will alter the electric field because its dialectric properties are different from that of air. If we now make contact, charged carriers will "flow", of value depending on other physical properties of the medium. Is there any reason why the potential (what we measure with a perfect volmeter) should decrease linearly from end to centre point? Other than blind obediance of Ohms law.

Please excuse me if your above references that I haven't had time to study already answer this question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K