Resistors in Series - Lab data confusion

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on confusion regarding lab data from a series circuit involving resistors. The user notes that while the total resistance calculated matches the sum of individual resistances, the current and voltage measurements do not conform to expected series circuit behavior. Suggestions indicate a possible misconfiguration of the circuit, potentially set up in parallel, or a misreading of the current meter, possibly measuring milliamps instead of amps. Despite the discrepancies, the user is able to calculate total resistance correctly using Ohm's law. The conversation highlights the challenges of lab work in introductory courses, particularly with limited time for experimentation.
shmoop

Homework Statement



(see my attached photo to better understand where I am coming from!)

So after some research, I've discovered that the current at different points in a simple series circuit is supposed to be the same value, and that the voltage is supposed to be different values.

I performed a lab on resistors in series the other day, and I believe my data is incorrect.
The majority of the data I got tells me that I may have set my circuit up as a parallel series - however the fact that the total measured current is not equal to the sum of the separate currents measured at each resistors conflicts with this. (see attached image of my lab data for clarity!)

Furthermore, due to the value of the total current as well as the value of the total voltage, the total R calculated using Ohm's law is equal to the Req that was calculated through adding the individual resistances up (which were also calculated through Ohm's law).

I am wondering, what did I do to obtain this kind of data information? As it does not conform what I would designate as a series circuit, nor a parallel circuit.

Does anyone have any idea what I have done to obtain this lab data? What kind of circuit did I create?

Thanks a lot in advance.

Homework Equations



Variables:
V=Voltage (V)
I=Current(A)
R=Resistance (Ohms)

V=IR

Rtotal(series circuit)=R1+R2+R3

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure. I know that when I compare my total resistance with my individually calculated resistances (which were then used to, I get the same value. However, the current and voltage do not follow the trends of a series circuit. I thought potentially I mixed up the voltage and current values - but that is not the case. Because then the comparative resistance values do not match as they currently do.
 

Attachments

  • 21362985_10212281109076164_594219238_n (1).jpg
    21362985_10212281109076164_594219238_n (1).jpg
    22.2 KB · Views: 523
Physics news on Phys.org
It would be nice if they would let you repeat this laboratory experiment, but oftentimes, in the introductory courses, laboratory time is at a premium. It looks like you may have set the resistors in parallel as you mentioned, but I think you also misread the scale on the current meter. Most likely you measured milliamps and not amps. You would not have a current of 50 amperes=that is some very hefty current that would require thick cables and a powerful power supply to generate.
 
Charles Link said:
It would be nice if they would let you repeat this laboratory experiment, but oftentimes, in the introductory courses, laboratory time is at a premium. It looks like you may have set the resistors in parallel as you mentioned, but I think you also misread the scale on the current meter. Most likely you measured milliamps and not amps. You would not have a current of 50 amperes=that is some very hefty current that would require thick cables and a powerful power supply to generate.

You're probably correct. However this was my set up... and it looks alright to me?

Is there a reason why when I use R=R1+R2+R3
That it works? If it were parallel it would not... correct?
IMG_6541.JPG
 
You show the resistors connected in series. Explain how you measured the individual current in each resistor.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
819
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K