Resolving in the vertical direction and along the direction of the normal force

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
influx
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1429110373.315217.jpg

Ok I know this is simple resolving but I'm a bit confused. If we resolve forces in the vertical y direction (as in the attached image), we obtain Rcos(theta)-W=0 and hence Rcos(theta) = W meaning R = W/cos(theta) [where theta = 18 degrees]

However, if we resolve forces along the direction of the normal force, R, we obtain R - Wcos(theta) = 0 and hence R = Wcos(theta) [again theta=18]. These 2 results for R appear to contradict so what have I done wrong?

Cheers
 
on Phys.org
influx said:
View attachment 82057
Ok I know this is simple resolving but I'm a bit confused. If we resolve forces in the vertical y direction (as in the attached image), we obtain Rcos(theta)-W=0 and hence Rcos(theta) = W meaning R = W/cos(theta) [where theta = 18 degrees]

However, if we resolve forces along the direction of the normal force, R, we obtain R - Wcos(theta) = 0 and hence R = Wcos(theta) [again theta=18]. These 2 results for R appear to contradict so what have I done wrong?

Cheers
The first approach as per the solution is correct, since there is no acceleration or component thereof in the vertical direction.

The second approach is incorrect, because if you resolve forces along the normal direction, the acceleration is not 0 in the normal direction; there is a component of the radial acceleration in that direction, so equilibrium does not apply in that direction normal to the plane.
 
PhanthomJay said:
The first approach as per the solution is correct, since there is no acceleration or component thereof in the vertical direction.

The second approach is incorrect, because if you resolve forces along the normal direction, the acceleration is not 0 in the normal direction; there is a component of the radial acceleration in that direction, so equilibrium does not apply in that direction normal to the plane.
Ah I see. With radial acceleration you are referring to an right?