Resolving Phase Ambiguity in Pulsed Doppler Ultrasound

AI Thread Summary
Pulsed Doppler ultrasound operates by sampling echoes during a fixed time period, allowing for depth-specific measurements. The discussion highlights a confusion regarding phase information extraction when multiple reflections are received from different moving targets, likened to a series of doors moving away. It is noted that while frequency measurements can determine velocity without ambiguity, phase measurements can introduce ambiguity if the velocity causes a phase change exceeding one cycle per pulse. This ambiguity primarily affects stationary or slowly moving targets. Understanding these principles is crucial for effectively interpreting Doppler ultrasound data.
BobP
Messages
70
Reaction score
1
Hi.
I understand the principle behind Pulsed doppler ultrasound. If the echo from a transmit pulse is sampled (gated) during a narrow fixed time period, the echo will correspond to a particular depth. What I do not understand is how we can extract phase information by repeating the process of transmit-echo-transmit-echo over and over again.

Here is why (I am going to use an analogy to explain my problem).
If we have a door that is moving away from us then if we transmit-recieve-transmit-recieve... then each time we transmit our signal the door will be slightly further away so it will take longer to receive the reflection. Hence we get a phase shift.

If however we have a stack of thousands of doors flowing along a line and we measure the reflection from a distance, d, from our transmitter (as we do with pulsed ultrasound) we will be receiving the reflection from a different door each time (we are not following a single door) hence there should be no phase shift as the reflection will occur at the same time, each time.

Is my problem clear?
Thanks for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BobP said:
Hi.
I understand the principle behind Pulsed doppler ultrasound. If the echo from a transmit pulse is sampled (gated) during a narrow fixed time period, the echo will correspond to a particular depth. What I do not understand is how we can extract phase information by repeating the process of transmit-echo-transmit-echo over and over again.

Here is why (I am going to use an analogy to explain my problem).
If we have a door that is moving away from us then if we transmit-recieve-transmit-recieve... then each time we transmit our signal the door will be slightly further away so it will take longer to receive the reflection. Hence we get a phase shift.

If however we have a stack of thousands of doors flowing along a line and we measure the reflection from a distance, d, from our transmitter (as we do with pulsed ultrasound) we will be receiving the reflection from a different door each time (we are not following a single door) hence there should be no phase shift as the reflection will occur at the same time, each time.

Is my problem clear?
Thanks for your help
If a Doppler radar uses frequency to find velocity there is no ambiguity. If the radar measures phase, it can find distance, but there will be an ambiguity if the velocity creates a phase change of more than one cycle for each pulse. So it is for stationary or slow moving targets.
 
  • Like
Likes BobP
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top