All too often members of this forum are referencing wikipedia and I believe that site does not offer a valid representational view of science. The reason why members quote from wikipedia is that we often type words into google and the first result is wikipedia - no surprise. I am all for thinking analytically and critically and so I propose a "Resources" section in header section of PF, in between library and staff. This section would pose as a link library to various websites and alternatives to google and wikipedia. This could be expanded by giving it a separate section in the forums where members can post new links and moderators can then decide which ones to add to the resources section. If this went ahead then it would hopefully promote people not to use wikipedia. Discuss.