Restrictions on the frame of reference

AI Thread Summary
Newton's laws are applicable only in inertial frames, which complicates the use of the center of mass (CM) as a reference frame when it is accelerating. If the CM accelerates in the vertical direction, it may still serve as a valid frame for analyzing motion in the horizontal directions. When calculating torque about the CM while it accelerates, the torque can still be valid as long as it is not aligned with the direction of acceleration. The discussion highlights that torques can be calculated from both inertial and non-inertial frames, with fictitious forces affecting the CM but not the torque calculations. Overall, understanding the nuances of reference frames is crucial for accurate physical analysis.
yucheng
Messages
232
Reaction score
57
Homework Statement
N/A
Relevant Equations
N/A
Newton's laws only hold in intertial frames. In general, the center of mass (CM) is accelerating, so it cannot be used as a frame. However,

1. Suppose that CM is accelerating only in the ##\hat{z}## direction. Does this mean that the CM frame is still valid in the ##\hat{x}## and ##\hat{y}## direction?

2. For rotation, suppose we want to find the torque about the CM, and the CM is acclerating in the ##\hat{x}## direction. We find that a torque about CM as origin, ##\tau = f \hat{z}## Is this then a valid frame of reference for torques as long as they are not in the same direction as the acceleration?

Context(Kleppner and Kolenkow, Problem 7.6:
SmartSelect_20210626-123730_Adobe Acrobat.jpg

So the author found the torques around the CM (the black dot), and since the person is moving around a circular track, there is a centripetal acceleration acting on the CM, and so it should not be inertial.P.S. actually, any point that is accelerating with the conditions given, not just CM.

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
yucheng said:
the author found the torques around the CM
It is not clear to me from your post which frame of reference the author is using. Finding a torque about the CM can be done in either.
I do not have a copy of the book you cite.
 
haruspex said:
It is not clear to me from your post which frame of reference the author is using. Finding a torque about the CM can be done in either.
I do not have a copy of the book you cite.
The big dot at the person's stomach.

All the torques are taken with respect to that dot
 
yucheng said:
The big dot at the middle

All the torques are taken with respect to that dot
The author is taking moments about the CM (big black dot), but that does not imply the author is taking the 3D person as the reference frame. You can choose a static frame with origin at the person's CM at some instant; or you could choose a non inertial frame which is anchored to the CM, so orbits the centre of curvature of the track, but does not rotate relative to the ground frame.
Whichever, any fictitious forces act at the CM, so do not affect the torque about there. In all cases, the torque from the difference in the two normal forces balances the torque from the frictional forces.
 
I didn't even expect to receive so much interesting information. Very interesting forum
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top