TMFKAN64 said:
Perhaps I should have underlined "midlife" in my first post.
I have plenty of papers... but only two relevant (physics) ones.
I have years of employment and skills in computation and programming, but no physics experience beyond classwork.
I'm not sure what to include and what to leave out, because I don't want my resume to be dominated by computer credentials when I'm aiming in a different direction. On the other hand, I think I need to say *something* about it.
I'm not a confident writer... that's why I'm looking for professional help.
I participate in the hiring process at my company. I'll review resumes and interview the person that our group hires. When I review the resume, I'm looking for relevant experience.
I look for the academic program, and if the person is a professional, I'll look at the employment history and job descriptions. I want to know if the person has experience with the type of analyses we do, if they have developed analytical models, if they are familiar with the state-of-the-art, and if they have an understanding of the field.
If I was in manufacturing, I'd be looking for the type of manufacturing experience, process development, operational experience, etc.
As Andy Resnick indicated, the resume should be tailored to the type of job in which one is interested.
When our group responds to an RFQ/RFP, part of the response is the resumes of those who perform the work. Mine includes a brief summary of my academic background, a section that describes in general (non-proprietary detail) the relevant projects to which I've contributed (professional experience), and a bibliography of publications. The professional experience can be short or long depending on the scope of work described in the proposal.