News Retroactive War Crimes Protection

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rach3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Protection
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proposed amendments to the War Crimes Act by the Bush administration, which would retroactively protect policymakers from criminal charges related to the treatment of detainees. Lawyers familiar with the proposal indicate that it is in revision but may advance in Congress soon. Concerns are raised about the implications of such legislation, with one attorney suggesting it could effectively immunize past actions that may be classified as war crimes. The proposal is viewed as a significant threat to legal accountability, with critics arguing it reflects an assertion of unchecked presidential power. The conversation also touches on broader political sentiments, expressing hope for a future government that addresses the perceived damage caused by the Bush administration's policies.
Rach3
"Retroactive War Crimes Protection"

Retroactive War Crime Protection Proposed

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Bush administration drafted amendments to the War Crimes Act that would retroactively protect policymakers from possible criminal charges for authorizing any humiliating and degrading treatment of detainees, according to lawyers who have seen the proposal.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-War-Crimes.html?_r=1&oref=login

So hypothetically, if they had (which they didn't) done something horribly inhuman and grossly illegal, they would be retroactively immunized. Of course there's no reason to be suspicious. This is just a routine legislation which will never be used, so no reason to oppose it.

Two attorneys said that the draft is in the revision stage but that the administration seems intent on pushing forward the draft's major points in Congress after Labor Day. The two attorneys spoke on condition of anonymity because their sources did not authorize them to release the information.

''I think what this bill can do is in effect immunize past crimes. That's why it's so dangerous,'' said a third attorney, Eugene Fidell, president of the National Institute of Military Justice.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-War-Crimes.html?_r=1&oref=login
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The Bush presidency seems to assert
1) The president can do anything he likes and no law or constitutional limitation applies to him.
2) And he isn't legally responsible for any consequences either.

L'etat, c'est lui.
 
Zut alors, mon dieu, c'est incroyable! :biggrin: Just kidding.

I agree he is the state, it sounds very faccist, but I wouldn't go so far as to compare it to any government in history.

Neocons est mais un mal transitoire. J'espere, sincerement.

I'm hoping that a more tolerant government will previal in the US, one that will repair the damage Bush has so evidently done both at home and in the Middle East.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Back
Top