Reviewing statics and came across this problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cyrus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the analysis of a beam with a pin connection at one end and a roller at the other, focusing on the internal shear and moment when sectioning the beam. It is established that while a moment can act anywhere along the beam, when a section is taken at the roller end, the moment must be excluded from that section. This is due to the fact that the section cannot "see" the couple moment when isolated, even though the entire beam rotates due to the moment at the pin. The placement of the couple moment affects the internal moments and stresses of the section, demonstrating the importance of understanding how moments interact with beam sections.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium in beam analysis
  • Familiarity with internal shear and moment diagrams
  • Knowledge of free body diagrams and sectioning techniques
  • Concept of couple moments as free vectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium in structural analysis
  • Learn how to construct shear and moment diagrams for beams
  • Explore the effects of different support types on beam behavior
  • Investigate the implications of couple moments in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, civil engineering students, and anyone involved in mechanical analysis of beams and static systems will benefit from this discussion.

Cyrus
Messages
3,237
Reaction score
17
Im reviewing statics and came across this problem. There is a beam pin connected at one end and roller connected on the other. There is a moment at the pin and a force somewhere along the beam. Then they section it to find the internal normal shear and moment. One of the things i found slightly contraditory was that the moment can act anywhere along the beam. It causes the whole beam to rotate. But when the section the end where the roller is, they have to leave off the moment. This makes sense, I understand what there doing. The contradition seems to be that this end does not see the moment cuase where the pin is. Yet at the same time the moment at the pin causes the entire beam to rotate.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think I figure it out. When you have the entire beam, all parts can "see" the couple moment because it is a free vector. When you section off a portion of the beam, it can no longer "see" the couple moment. This does not mean that this section does not want to roate in the direction of the moment anymore. It still does, when you reconnect it with the rest of the beam. But once you chop it off, it "sees" a different moment acting on it, or possibly no moment, and this due strictly to the internal moment of the section itself. The couple is a free vector, so if u do choose to place it where the section is, then in this case it will now act on the section, and you will get a different internal moment. So even though the couple is a free vector that can act anywhere on the beam, its placement on the beam DOES have an affect on the internal moments and stresses of that section.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
571
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K