Revisiting an old Math Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter manuelsmarin
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a request for feedback on a high school algebra problem, which some participants believe may relate to Fermat's Last Theorem. Concerns are raised about the clarity and rigor of the proof presented, with one member criticizing the use of basic statements as overly simplistic for a significant mathematical claim. Tensions arise as accusations of bullying are exchanged, highlighting a divide in the forum's dynamics. Specific requests for clarification on proof steps indicate a desire for deeper understanding and constructive critique. Overall, the conversation reflects the challenges of peer review in mathematical discussions.
manuelsmarin
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Would someone check the attached file? It's simple high school algebra.
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
manuelsmarin said:
Would someone check the attached file? It's simple high school algebra.



I just read the very first few lines, as it seems to be one more simple ""proof"" of Fermat's last Theorem or something of

the kind. The language used is sloppy, and where it begins with that nonsense of
\text{if}\,\,A+B=C+D\,\,\text{and}\,\,A=C\,\,,\, \text{then} \,\,B=D
which is so boringly obvious that it shouldn't even appear in a paper trying to prove "a very important theorem of mathematics"

DonAntonio
 
Are you the only member of this forum? You're such a bully...
 
manuelsmarin said:
Are you the only member of this forum? You're such a bully...


"Bully"? Were you expecting me, or anyone else, to write your opinion on this, or you'd rather have my own opinion?

Well, perhaps other members of the forum have different opinions. Good luck with that.

DonAntonio
 
DonAntonio: I can't find where he says what you say he says. Can you please point out the page and the phrase that was used?
 
Hi manuelsmarin and welcome to the forums.

Can you please explain in more detail step [8] of the general proof for n > 2? I get all the identities including step 9 used for later steps (i.e. 10 and greater) but not that one. What assumptions have you made?
 
chiro said:
DonAntonio: I can't find where he says what you say he says. Can you please point out the page and the phrase that was used?

Page 2, Test For Equality Theorem
IF ##(x-y+z)=(u+w)## AND either ##(x-y)=u## or ##(x-y)=w##, THEN, in the first case, ##z=w## or, in the second case, ##z=u##.
 
Personal theories are not allowed in this forum.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
764
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top