RF Power Meter / SWR Meter Equivalent Circuit

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around modeling a power meter and SWR meter in RF electronics, specifically focusing on their equivalent circuits and how they interact with transmission lines. Participants explore various aspects of power measurement, including impedance characteristics and the role of directional couplers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a power meter can be modeled as a 50 ohm load, while others propose that it may involve more complex components like transformers or directional couplers.
  • A participant mentions that a power meter could be built by measuring temperature changes in a 50 ohm termination due to incoming radiation.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of the signal being measured, with one participant noting that a simple SWR meter may not be suitable for RF packets as opposed to continuous wave (CW) signals.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the power meter should ideally be a purely resistive 50 ohm load across all frequencies.
  • Concerns are raised about the insertion loss of the power meter and its impact on circuit simulations, with suggestions to check specifications from the manufacturer.
  • Some participants mention the use of directional couplers in SWR meters and provide links to resources for further reading on the topic.
  • There is a mention of an alternative approach for SWR meters based on lumped components, which may be tweaked for specific frequency ranges.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the modeling of power meters and SWR meters. While some agree on the 50 ohm load characterization, others introduce alternative views and methods, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the equivalent circuit for the power meter may depend on specific conditions, such as the frequency of operation and the type of signal being measured. There are also references to missing specifications and the need for further exploration of circuit models.

Mzzed
Messages
67
Reaction score
5
I'm starting to get into RF electronics, and an upcoming project involves the use of a power meter / SWR meter. How do we model a power meter in terms of an equivalent circuit? i.e. is it just another impedance? or a transformer? or does it not effect the circuit at all, so we just don't include it in circuit simulations?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I am not quite sure I understand what you are asking, but from a circuit point of view it should just be a 50 ohm load.

Note that you can actually build a working power meter by measuring the increase in temperature of a 50 ohm termination as it warmed up by the incoming radiation. Hence, a good power meter should be a nearly ideal 50 ohm load (=a 50 ohm resistor).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
A directional wattmeter or uncalibrated reflectometer uses directional couplers. Google should turn up some pretty good hits. There are several methods used to accomplish this. An ARRL handbook or antenna book would be a good start.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff and berkeman
Mzzed said:
I'm starting to get into RF electronics, and an upcoming project involves the use of a power meter / SWR meter. How do we model a power meter in terms of an equivalent circuit? i.e. is it just another impedance? or a transformer? or does it not effect the circuit at all, so we just don't include it in circuit simulations?
What is the nature of your transmissions? If they are RF packets and not CW, then a simple SWR meter will not be of use.
 
Thanks for all the answers. I'm planning on using a diamond SX100 power meter for measuring the power and SWR of a simple 13.56MHz sine wave, no data transfer or anything involved. There don't seem to be any datasheets on that power meter either. I more meant what is the equivalent circuit i should be using in my simulations - e.g. i know it should be 50 ohms impedance but does that look like a capacitor and inductor in parallel? or just a large capacitor in series? what is the equivalent circuit I should be using to simulate the power meter?
 
It is still not quite clear what you are planning to do.

A "simple" power meter which measures the forward propagating power in a transmission line should ideally just be a 50 ohm load at all frequencies (i.e. purely resistive)

An SWR meter uses a directional coupler to measure the forward and reflected power using said power meter. Hence, the "power meter part" would once again just be a 50 ohm load. whereas the coupler would be just that.

Also, there is no such thing as the SWR of a sine wave. SWR is a property of a component; it is essentially just another way to describe the impedance mismatch at a given frequency.

If your simulation software does not include a coupler you would need to create circuit model of one. You should be able to find a few ways of doing this if you google.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mzzed and berkeman
So you have a transmission line delivering power to a load with the Diamond SX100 in-line. Ideally, ignore it. Yes, it will have some insertion loss, what are the specs? If you want to get technical you will have to check your network with a network analyzer. I would say what the manufacturer tells you is the best you have to go on.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mzzed
Thanks all, I think the correct way of thinking is to just to assume 1W will be lost due to the 0.1dB insertion lost, I was definitely overthinking it.

Cheers
 
  • #10
Mzzed said:
I think the correct way of thinking is to just to assume 1W will be lost due to the 0.1dB insertion lost,
The amount lost depends on the input power, which you didn't state

you also still haven't answered the question about what you are trying to achieve with this 13.56 MHz signal
 
  • #11
yeah I just checked the maximum insertion loss of the power meter and used that. Also it's for an inductively coupled plasma source :)
 
  • #12
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Averagesupernova

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K