RF Power Transfer: Halbach vs. Dipole

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Esquilo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the comparison of two configurations for wireless power transmission (WPT): a resonant dipole coil system (DCRS) and a non-resonant Halbach array. Participants explore the efficiency of these systems at kilohertz frequencies and their ability to transmit power over distances greater than the length of the systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the DCRS is effective for high power transmission but lacks directionality, while the Halbach array is more directive but has implementation challenges.
  • Another participant requests sketches to clarify the configurations being discussed, indicating a lack of understanding of the concepts presented.
  • Concerns are raised about the Halbach array's requirement for pulsed DC and the complications associated with voltage variability.
  • Participants discuss the efficiency of the DCRS, citing a performance of 36% at a distance equal to the solenoid's length, while the Halbach array is suggested to potentially double this efficiency.
  • One participant expresses a desire to study WPT technology, focusing on the efficiency decrease with increasing distance and comparing the two technologies under similar conditions.
  • There is mention of a paper proposing the use of Halbach arrays to improve range and efficiency in wireless charging, highlighting the limitations of traditional systems.
  • Another participant suggests that parabolic reflectors are the most efficient way to focus RF power, questioning if this technology can be applied to the discussed systems.
  • One participant clarifies that their goal is educational, aiming to understand the efficiency of both systems at specified parameters, including low power levels and specific frequencies.
  • There are discussions about the challenges of accessing relevant academic articles and the desire for formulas to calculate magnetic field characteristics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the advantages and disadvantages of the DCRS and Halbach array, with no consensus reached on which system is superior for wireless power transmission. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal configuration for efficiency.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in accessing academic resources and the complexity of calculating external magnetic fields for the DCRS. There are unresolved questions about the necessary formulas and assumptions related to the systems being compared.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals studying wireless power transmission technologies, particularly those exploring the efficiency and implementation of different electromagnetic configurations.

Esquilo
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Good morning, I followed this thread https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/halbach-array-arrangement-for-a-transformer.979745/, about wireless power transmission using a Halbach array and @Baluncore answers are were very satisfying. Here are two configurations, the first is a resonant dipole coil system, but in my case non-resonant, and the second configuration involves a non-resonant array of Halbach electromagnets, in which of the two cases there is a greater transmission efficiency at frequencies of the order of khz at a distance double the length of the system, and in any case forming a more directional cone of magnetic lines.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you please post some sketches for what you are considering? To be honest I still don't understand your previous thread, and this one is not any clearer for me. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Esquilo and DaveE
berkeman said:
Can you please post some sketches for what you are considering? To be honest I still don't understand your previous thread, and this one is not any clearer for me. Thanks.
good morning berkerman, yes then, the dipole coil resonant system is an excellent technology for transmitting energy wirelessly with high powers, but it is not very directive because the concentric field lines propagate in all directions, but I can use a backiron as a reflector. the halbach array is very directive but its implementation with electromagnets is complicated due to the variability of voltages. therefore I would only like to investigate which of the two solutions, with the necessary improvements, can transmit energy with greater efficiency for the same size. Attached is the dipole coil resonant system
1-Figure1-1.png
 
as @Baluncore said, the halbach array needs many precautions, for example we cannot use AC for the arrangement, but pulsed DC with low levels of phase shifts and with the addition of high-speed diodes at the ends. so both solutions have strengths and weaknesses but I would like to understand which of the two is the best for the non-resonant WPT
 
To be honest, I'm still not understanding what you are trying to do.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Esquilo
berkeman said:
To be honest, I'm still not understanding what you are trying to do.
Ok then berkerman, I would like to study wpt technology. The biggest problem is the decrease in efficiency as distance increases. Now I have two technologies, the DCRS and the halbach.

The DCRS uses the presence of the ferrite core to increase the intensity of the magnetic field but it is not very directive and therefore radiates its power in all directions to the detriment of the direction.

The halbach on the other hand is very directive but has various problems such as the use of AC and frequency. There is a patent on Google in which the magnetic cores of the halbach are joined together to make it a single solenoid.

Now I ask you, which of the two technologies (DCRS or Halbach) with the same length, current intensity and frequency, is able to transmit more efficiently at a distance double the length?
 
unfortunately I don't have access to IEEE explore, there is the only study on DCRS, the performance of DCRS is 36% at a distance equal to the length of the solenoid, while for Halbach with the same frequency and length it should double.
 
What is your goal in Wireless Power Transfer? What power levels? What distances? What frequency do you want to use?

The most efficient way to focus RF power is with parabolic reflectors. Can you use that technology?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Esquilo
  • #10
Esquilo said:
unfortunately I don't have access to IEEE explore, there is the only study on DCRS, the performance of DCRS is 36% at a distance equal to the length of the solenoid, while for Halbach with the same frequency and length it should double.
Using Halbach Arrays for Improving Range and Efficiency of Contactless Wireless Chargers
Abstract:
This paper aims to improve the traditional wireless systems using Halbach array. Drawbacks of traditional wireless systems have been studied and it is found that one of the central problems with current wireless charging systems is its limited range and power transfer inefficiency. These greatly hamper the mobility of the system and causes inconvenience to the user. To improve this, use of Halbach arrays has been proposed which improves the directionality of the charger. A tower-like structure is proposed which can transfer power over longer distances than current wireless chargers which will remove the restriction of the charging device to stay in contact with the charger for efficient charging.

You may not have access to IEEE Explore, but this 2020 article from there seems likely to be highly relevant to your project. And it's available as a PDF for just $33 US. Why reinvent something from scratch if you can build upon previous work? What monetary value do you put on saving your own time and effort?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Esquilo
  • #11
berkeman said:
What is your goal in Wireless Power Transfer? What power levels? What distances? What frequency do you want to use?

The most efficient way to focus RF power is with parabolic reflectors. Can you use that technology?

good morning berkemann yes, the powers are very low, I only want to transfer a few mW, my aim is to study which of the two systems is the best, so my aim is educational. the dimensions I take into consideration are: solenoid length 40 cm, current intensity 10 mA, frequency from 20 to 200 khz according to studies on other systems, I would like to study how much the efficiency is equivalent to 80 cm, therefore double the length. therefore the values are the same for both but the system changes (DCRS and Halbach) unfortunately there are no formulas, such as calculating the magnetization (volume) of the magnetic core. that's all
 
  • #12
@berkeman I can't use the dish because I'm not using microwaves, but inductive coupling, and therefore energy transfer through magnetic fields, perhaps the dish can serve as a backiron to convey the rear magnetic field of the DCRS
 
  • #13
renormalize said:
Using Halbach Arrays for Improving Range and Efficiency of Contactless Wireless Chargers
Abstract:
This paper aims to improve the traditional wireless systems using Halbach array. Drawbacks of traditional wireless systems have been studied and it is found that one of the central problems with current wireless charging systems is its limited range and power transfer inefficiency. These greatly hamper the mobility of the system and causes inconvenience to the user. To improve this, use of Halbach arrays has been proposed which improves the directionality of the charger. A tower-like structure is proposed which can transfer power over longer distances than current wireless chargers which will remove the restriction of the charging device to stay in contact with the charger for efficient charging.

You may not have access to IEEE Explore, but this 2020 article from there seems likely to be highly relevant to your project. And it's available as a PDF for just $33 US. Why reinvent something from scratch if you can build upon previous work? What monetary value do you put on saving your own time and effort?
hi, I tried to buy the item but I had problems paying in dollars. However, I have seen many academic articles about dipoles and coils with sparse windings, and only the various tests are listed, with the various data, but I want to know the formulas and understand, also because in the end they are just dipoles, the main problem of the DCRS is to calculate the external magnetic field
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K