RLC Circuit Calculations - How Do Wattmeters Work?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding RLC circuits and the operation of wattmeters in measuring power. The original poster presents two circuit diagrams and expresses confusion regarding the readings of various meters, particularly the wattmeter, in relation to the voltage and current measurements provided by other meters in the circuits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between voltage, current, and power in circuits with reactive components, questioning why wattmeter readings differ from simple calculations based on voltmeter and ammeter values. There is discussion about how wattmeters account for phase differences between voltage and current.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the operation of wattmeters and the nature of real versus apparent power. There is ongoing inquiry into the specifics of how wattmeters detect phase differences and the implications for power calculations in the presented circuits. Multiple interpretations of the circuit behavior are being explored.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates a lack of familiarity with complex numbers and circuit analysis, which may affect their understanding of the concepts discussed. There are references to specific circuit diagrams that are not visible to all participants, potentially limiting the discussion's clarity.

fawk3s
Messages
341
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



There are two circuits I don't entirely understand. I am also new to calculations with complex numbers and when to and when not to use them, so be easy on me. Anyways, the point is to find out what the different meters are showing, when you are given the initial voltage and the frequency of the current.

Here's the first one:
http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg141/scaled.php?server=141&filename=21362017.png&res=landing

So basically, its a circuit consisting of 2 resistors and an inductor. Whats interesting, but also confusing to me, is what the wattmeter is showing. The voltmeter U2, which is connected to basically the same point as the wattmeter, is showing 138 V. The ampermeter I1 is showing 1.24 A, which is measuring the same current as the wattmeter. That gives us the power P=1.24*138=171.12 W.
By doing some calculations I found out that 171.12 W is the power on the inductor and the resistor R2 together, on their impedance. But 92 W is the power on the resistor R2 alone.
So I guess my question here would be why is it so? How does the wattmeter work? I always thought that the wattmeter would measure the voltage and current, then somehow multiply them, and give us the result. But clearly, the multiplication of what the voltmeter and the ampermeter are showing us gives us a different result.
I do understand that the inductor preserves evergy as a magnetic field and then releases it, but I am still confused here. The voltmeter registers the voltage on the inductor, why doesn't the wattmeter?

The second situation I don't understand:
http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg16/scaled.php?server=16&filename=ac2h.png&res=landing

In this case, I don't really understand much. I am guessing you can add the capacities together, because they are in parallel. So that would give us a single 31 μF capacitor. But where to go from there? I am guessing we need the total impedance to find the current in I1. From there on I am guessing we could find U0 and U2. But how to find the impedance in this case? I tried a few ways but I guess they were wrong because the numers didnt match the ones in the picture. And again, why is the wattmeter showing the sum of the powers on resistors R2 and R3?

EDIT: for the ones who don't see the images for some reason:
1. http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg141/scaled.php?server=141&filename=21362017.png&res=landing
2. http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg16/scaled.php?server=16&filename=ac2h.png&res=landing

Thanks in advance,
fawk3s

Homework Equations

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The individual voltage and current meters are providing the amplitude (rms usually) of the voltage and current waveforms. However, because the circuits contain reactive components, the voltage and current waveforms are not in phase -- they reach their zeros and peaks at different times. Since the power is given by the multiplication of the voltage and current values at any given instant, and the peaks don't coincide, the amplitude of the power curve will not be the product of the peak values of each.

Wattmeters are clever beasts that will read the amplitude of the real power curve that results from the multiplication of the out of phase voltage and current waveforms.
 
So, what you're saying is that volt and ampermeters measure the effective values, and so does the wattmeter, but since the wattmeter measures them at the same instant, it is able to detect the phase differences?
I've never really dived into exactly how the wattmeter works. Always figured it was just something that had amper and volt meter combined, and just "multiplied" the effective values, but apparently not. Since you seem to know about it, would you mind sharing some knowledge with me on what goes on inside the wattmeter?

(Yes, I do know what Wikipedia is, but most of the stuff on the net doesn't seem to have the necessary details I am looking for, so I'd really appreciate the help.)
 
fawk3s said:
So, what you're saying is that volt and ampermeters measure the effective values, and so does the wattmeter, but since the wattmeter measures them at the same instant, it is able to detect the phase differences?
I've never really dived into exactly how the wattmeter works. Always figured it was just something that had amper and volt meter combined, and just "multiplied" the effective values, but apparently not. Since you seem to know about it, would you mind sharing some knowledge with me on what goes on inside the wattmeter?
The details depend upon the implementation of the wattmeter. There are various physical implementations to accomplish the result. Presumably the latest versions accomplish the measurements and multiplication digitally, then find the amplitude of the resulting curve.

Effectively, the wattmeter shows you the Real (or average) value of the power delivered, which is the power actually consumed by dissipative devices (resistors in this case).

On the other hand, multiplying the voltage and current meter readings yields the Apparent Power delivered, which is the magnitude of the complex power including the Real and Imaginary (reactive) components. The Real power is dissipated on resistances while the imaginary power is stored and returned by reactive components.

attachment.php?attachmentid=51570&stc=1&d=1349477168.gif
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    1.5 KB · Views: 567
Im still not sure I understand. The average power dissipated in case of the waves being in phase is the multiplication of the effective values, right?

P = Imax/sqrt(2) * Umax/sqrt(2)

And this is exactly what the amper and volt meters are showing. So the only way that the wattmeter could be giving a different result is when it actually detects the phase differences. And that still raises the question on how it does it.
Or am I wrong somewhere or just ignorantly missing something?

And could somebody give some enlightment what goes on in the second circuit? I can't really see how Kirchhoff's first law applies there.

Thanks in advance
 
Think of a heater: connected it to AC supply, it warms up, produces heat. The voltage is in phase with the current in case of a resistor, so the instantaneous power is P=UI=Umax(coswt)Imaxcos(wt). The temperature of the resistor will not change together with the instantaneous power, but depends on the average power. The average power on a resistor is Pav=UrmsIrms= Umax*Imax/2.
When the voltage and current are not in phase but there is a φ phase difference between them, the average power is UrmsIrmscos(φ)
For the working principle of power meters, see for example http://www.yokogawa.com/ymi/tutorial/tm-tutorial_wt_12.htm

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K