RLC Circuit Second Order Differential Equation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 4K views
SALAAH_BEDDIAF
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi there guys I am new to this forum and i have a problem with a bit of cw. It's regarding an RLC circuit. I've come up with a picture (attached) that denotes the equation.

Homework Equations



I know the equation is [tex]L C \frac{d^2 i}{d t^2} + \frac{L}{R} \frac{di}{dt} + i =i_s (t) , t≥<br /> 0[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I do not really know where to start to show that, I've been given the equation and i was able to draw out the circuit but from there I do not really know where to go as I do not know physics of a circuit very well
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2013-03-20 at 17.32.32.png
    Screen Shot 2013-03-20 at 17.32.32.png
    2.4 KB · Views: 740
Physics news on Phys.org
SALAAH_BEDDIAF said:

Homework Statement



Hi there guys I am new to this forum and i have a problem with a bit of cw. It's regarding an RLC circuit. I've come up with a picture (attached) that denotes the equation.

Homework Equations



I know the equation is [tex]L C \frac{d^2 i}{d t^2} + \frac{L}{R} \frac{di}{dt} + i =i_s (t) , t≥<br /> 0[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I do not really know where to start to show that, I've been given the equation and i was able to draw out the circuit but from there I do not really know where to go as I do not know physics of a circuit very well
attachment.php?attachmentid=56909&d=1363800929.png
Hello SALAAH_BEDDIAF. Welcome to PF !

(If your question is principally in regards to solving the differential equation, then you have posted this in the correct place. On the other hand, if it's principally in regards to understanding the physics leading to the differential equation, then we need to ask a moderator to move this thread to Introductory Physics.)

Is the quantity on the right hand side of the equation, the driving current? -- usually a sinusoidal such as [itex]\displaystyle \ i_s(t)=I_0\sin(\omega t)\[/itex] or [itex]\displaystyle \ i_s(t)=I_0\cos(\omega t)\[/itex]
 
SammyS said:
attachment.php?attachmentid=56909&d=1363800929.png



Hello SALAAH_BEDDIAF. Welcome to PF !

(If your question is principally in regards to solving the differential equation, then you have posted this in the correct place. On the other hand, if it's principally in regards to understanding the physics leading to the differential equation, then we need to ask a moderator to move this thread to Introductory Physics.)

Is the quantity on the right hand side of the equation, the driving current? -- usually a sinusoidal such as [itex]\displaystyle \ i_s(t)=I_0\sin(\omega t)\[/itex] or [itex]\displaystyle \ i_s(t)=I_0\cos(\omega t)\[/itex]

no I'm able to solve the equation, it's just that I'm ahving difficulty showing that the equation equals what i have given
 
SALAAH_BEDDIAF said:
no I'm able to solve the equation, it's just that I'm ahving difficulty showing that the equation equals what i have given

Start with
[itex]\displaystyle i_s(t)=i_1(t)+i(t)+i_2(t)\ .[/itex]​
This comes from applying Kirchhoff's Current Law.

Then since the inductor, the resistor and the capacitor are all in parallel, the instantaneous voltage across anyone of these devices is equal to the instantaneous voltage across any other one of these devices.
 
I think i may have got it? here is what i have
Current through resistor: [itex]\frac{1}{R}[/itex]

Current through inductor: [itex]\frac{1}{L} \int i\,dt[/itex]

Current through Capacitor: [itex]C\frac{dv}{dt}[/itex]

Applying kirchhoffs law i got

[itex]\frac{1}{R} + \frac{1}{L} \int i\,dt + C\frac{dv}{dt} = 0[/itex]

Differentiating wrt t i got

[itex]\frac{1}{R} \frac{di}{dt} + \frac{i}{L} + C \frac{d^2 i}{dt^2} = 0[/itex]

Rearranging to get the equation

[itex]LC \frac{d^2 i}{dt^2} + \frac{L}{R} \frac{di}{dt} + i = i_s (t)[/itex]

I'm pretty sure i missed something here, anyone ought to help me out?
 
SALAAH_BEDDIAF said:
I think i may have got it? here is what i have
Current through resistor: [itex]\frac{1}{R}[/itex]

Current through inductor: [itex]\frac{1}{L} \int i\,dt[/itex]

Current through Capacitor: [itex]C\frac{dv}{dt}[/itex]

Applying kirchhoffs law i got

[itex]\frac{1}{R} + \frac{1}{L} \int i\,dt + C\frac{dv}{dt} = 0[/itex]

Differentiating wrt t i got

[itex]\frac{1}{R} \frac{di}{dt} + \frac{i}{L} + C \frac{d^2 i}{dt^2} = 0[/itex]

Rearranging to get the equation

[itex]LC \frac{d^2 i}{dt^2} + \frac{L}{R} \frac{di}{dt} + i = i_s (t)[/itex]

I'm pretty sure i missed something here, anyone ought to help me out?
Some of your expressions are not quite right.

Let [itex]\displaystyle \ v(t)\[/itex] be the instantaneous voltage across each component.

For the resistor, [itex]\displaystyle \ v(t)=i_1 R\ .\ \[/itex] Notice that in the figure, the current through R is labeled, i1 .

For the inductor, [itex]\displaystyle \ v(t)=L\frac{di}{dt}\ .\ \[/itex]

For the capacitor, [itex]\displaystyle \ i_2=C\frac{dv}{dt}\ .\ \[/itex]

Use these to find how i, i1, and i2 are related.
 
okay i got [itex]i_1 + i_2 + i = i_s (t)[/itex]
using the equalities [itex]v = iR = L\frac{di}{dt} = \frac{Q}{C}[/itex]
I got [itex]i_1 R = L \frac{di}{dt} → i_1 = \frac{L}{R}\frac{di}{dt}[/itex]
not too sure how to transform [itex]C\frac{dv}{dt} → LC\frac{d^2 i}{dt^2}[/itex]
 
SALAAH_BEDDIAF said:
okay i got [itex]i_1 + i_2 + i = i_s (t)[/itex]
using the equalities [itex]v = iR = L\frac{di}{dt} = \frac{Q}{C}[/itex]
I got [itex]i_1 R = L \frac{di}{dt} → i_1 = \frac{L}{R}\frac{di}{dt}[/itex]
not too sure how to transform [itex]C\frac{dv}{dt} → LC\frac{d^2 i}{dt^2}[/itex]


Use [itex]\displaystyle \ v(t)=L\frac{di}{dt}\ \[/itex] to find the derivative of [itex]\displaystyle \ v(t)\ .\ \[/itex]

Then plug that into [itex]\displaystyle \ i_2=C\frac{dv}{dt}\ .\ \[/itex]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person