Rod colliding with the ground (Special relativity question)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in special relativity involving a rod falling vertically while a particle moves horizontally. The original poster attempts to analyze the collision of the rod with the ground from the perspective of the particle's frame, focusing on the angle the rod makes with the horizontal at the moment of collision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of simultaneity in different frames, questioning how the rod's length and motion are perceived in the particle frame compared to the ground frame. They discuss the need for proper notation regarding velocities and the effects of length contraction.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and corrections to each other's reasoning. Some participants suggest reconsidering the horizontal distance between the ends of the rod and its implications for the angle calculation, while others express curiosity about the absence of certain factors in the final expressions.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the treatment of simultaneity and the application of Lorentz transformations. Participants are also navigating the complexities of how the rod behaves in different reference frames, particularly regarding its contraction and the timing of events.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
Ok, so basically: There is a frase with a particle moving horizontally with velocity v and a rod parallel to the ground, with rest length L, falling with speed u vertical constant. The rod bounces off on the ground. Describe what happens in the particle frame and find the angle the rod makes with the horizontal when it collides in this frame.

So i tried this:

The event A, the left corner of the rod hits the ground.
The event B, the right corner hits the ground.

In the ground frame, Ta=Tb=0. ##\Delta x = L/\gamma_u##

So, LT to the particle frame, we have $$|\Delta t'| = |\gamma_v \beta_v \Delta x|, |\Delta x'| = | \gamma_v \Delta x|$$
That is, the rod don't hit the ground simultaneously, the right corner will hit it with a difference of time ##|\Delta t'|##

So, when the left corner touches the ground, the time the right corner is elevated ##y' = u \Delta t' = u' \gamma_v \beta_v \Delta x##

Since u is perpendicular to v, u', the vertical velocity of the rod in the particle frame, is ##u' = u/\gamma_v##.

##y' = u '\Delta t' = (u/\gamma_v) \gamma_v \beta_v \Delta x = u\beta_v \Delta x ##

##tan\theta' = y'/\Delta x' = u\beta_v \Delta x/\Delta x' = u\beta_v / \gamma_v##

Ignore the units, i put c=1.
This is just wrong. Could you help me to solve the question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
According to IFRs, the rod is horizontal, right up or left up in touching the ground. I do not find anything wrong with it.
 
Herculi said:
In the ground frame, Ta=Tb=0. ##\Delta x = L/\gamma_u##
In the ground frame, the rod is moving perpendicularly to its length. Should the rod be contracted in the ground frame?

Herculi said:
So, LT to the particle frame, we have $$|\Delta t'| = |\gamma_v \beta_v \Delta x|, |\Delta x'| = | \gamma_v \Delta x|$$
That is, the rod don't hit the ground simultaneously, the right corner will hit it with a difference of time ##|\Delta t'|##

So, when the left corner touches the ground, the time the right corner is elevated ##y' = u \Delta t' = u' \gamma_v \beta_v \Delta x##
Ok. In the middle expression, ##u## should have a prime. But you have it correct in the final expression.

Herculi said:
Since u is perpendicular to v, u', the vertical velocity of the rod in the particle frame, is ##u' = u/\gamma_v##.

##y' = u '\Delta t' = (u/\gamma_v) \gamma_v \beta_v \Delta x = u\beta_v \Delta x ##
Ok

Herculi said:
##tan\theta' = y'/\Delta x' = u\beta_v \Delta x/\Delta x' = u\beta_v / \gamma_v##
Here, ##\Delta x'## should be the (simultaneous) horizontal distance between the left and right ends of the rod as seen in the primed frame. This is not the same as the horizontal distance between events A and B as seen in the primed frame. In the primed frame, A and B do not occur simultaneously. So, the rod moves horizontally during the time between the events in the primed frame.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
TSny said:
In the ground frame, the rod is moving perpendicularly to its length. Should the rod be contracted in the ground frame?Ok. In the middle expression, ##u## should have a prime. But you have it correct in the final expression.OkHere, ##\Delta x'## should be the (simultaneous) horizontal distance between the left and right ends of the rod as seen in the primed frame. This is not the same as the horizontal distance between events A and B as seen in the primed frame. In the primed frame, A and B do not occur simultaneously. So, the rod moves horizontally during the time between the events in the primed frame.
Thank you by the reply. So considering the last paragraph, i think we could say that:
The horizontal distance between the ends of the rod will be equal to $$\Delta S = \Delta X' - v\Delta t' = \gamma_v \Delta X - v \gamma_v \beta_v \Delta X$$

So that $$tan = u\beta_v \Delta X/(\Delta X (\gamma_v - v \gamma_v \beta_v)) = u v / (\gamma_v - v^2 \gamma_v ) = uv \gamma_v$$

So, is that right? I was expecting something involving ##gamma_u## too. At least to me, it is quite amazing it does not appear here.
 
Herculi said:
The horizontal distance between the ends of the rod will be equal to $$\Delta S = \Delta X' - v\Delta t' = \gamma_v \Delta X - v \gamma_v \beta_v \Delta X$$

So that $$tan = u\beta_v \Delta X/(\Delta X (\gamma_v - v \gamma_v \beta_v)) = u v / (\gamma_v - v^2 \gamma_v ) = uv \gamma_v$$
That looks right.

It's interesting to consider the shape of the rod in the primed frame at times between the two events B and A for the case where the rod bounces elastically off the ground in the ground frame.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LCSphysicist

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K