Rope tangent angle over pully given position of offset load

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the symbolic resolution of the angle of a rope suspending a load between two pulleys, given the length of rope let out over the pulleys. Participants explore the geometric relationships involved, particularly focusing on vertical and horizontal distances, and the implications of pulley height differences. The context includes theoretical modeling and potential applications in dynamic geometric modeling software.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to symbolically resolve the angle of the rope based on the length of rope let out, aiming for modularity and accuracy.
  • Another participant questions the assumption that both pulleys have equal lengths of line to the load, given their differing vertical positions.
  • A participant suggests that the problem may be more complicated than initially presented and requests clarification on the specific goals.
  • One participant proposes a formula for calculating the angle in radians based on vertical height and horizontal distance from the pulley to the load attachment point.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about whether the problem can be solved in terms of the line let out at the winch and inquires about dynamic geometric modeling software.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the visual representation of the setup, including the distinction between a winch and a pulley.
  • Participants discuss the need to consider the radius of the pulley in their calculations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the angle can be resolved symbolically in terms of the line let out at the winch. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain regarding the geometric relationships and the complexity of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential missing assumptions about the system's geometry, the dependence on specific definitions of distances, and unresolved mathematical steps related to the angle calculation.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in mechanical systems involving pulleys, dynamic modeling, and those seeking to understand the geometric relationships in load suspension scenarios may find this discussion relevant.

Wayland Bugg
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I am trying to symbolically resolve the angle of rope that suspends a load (rectangle) between two pulleys given the length of rope that is let out over the pulleys. See attached image.

the load is not intended to move horizontally, only vertically. so you can imagine each pulley must have an equal length of line pulled or let out between them.

I can solve for this for any number of points for known lengths of rope with the assistance of CAD software and excel to generate a polynomial curve, but I would like to solve this only in terms of rope let out over the pulleys symbolically to achieve modularity and increased accuracy.

I am not sure this can be done, so I am seeking some insight and advice here.

Thank you
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    80.8 KB · Views: 645
Physics news on Phys.org
Wayland Bugg said:
I am trying to symbolically resolve the angle of rope that suspends a load (rectangle) between two pulleys given the length of rope that is let out over the pulleys. See attached image.

the load is not intended to move horizontally, only vertically. so you can imagine each pulley must have an equal length of line pulled or let out between them.

I can solve for this for any number of points for known lengths of rope with the assistance of CAD software and excel to generate a polynomial curve, but I would like to solve this only in terms of rope let out over the pulleys symbolically to achieve modularity and increased accuracy.

I am not sure this can be done, so I am seeking some insight and advice here.

Thank you

I don't see why you would assume each pulley has an equal length of line to the rectangle when your two pulleys don't seem to be at the same position vertically.
 
Can you be more specific on what you trying to solve because it sounds more complicated than it might actually be. :)
 
LCKurtz said:
I don't see why you would assume each pulley has an equal length of line to the rectangle when your two pulleys don't seem to be at the same position vertically.

You are right they are not at the same height or distance from the load. I misspoke when trying to articulate a visual. But a visual is all intended with that statement. If what I am trying to do were possible, one would only have to enter the vertical and horizontal distances from the center of the pulley to the load attachment point (for example) and could find the angle for any pulley/rope combo.
 
drphysica said:
Can you be more specific on what you trying to solve because it sounds more complicated than it might actually be. :)

I'd like the angle so I can calculate the vertical and horizontal force components for any given position.

If it helps, you could imagine a winch on the other side of the pulley.
 
Wayland Bugg said:
one would only have to enter the vertical and horizontal distances from the center of the pulley to the load attachment point (for example) and could find the angle for any pulley/rope combo.

You'd also need to enter the radius R of the pulley.
V = vertical height center of pulley above level attachment point
H = horizontal distance of center of pulley to vertical line through attachment point

I think the angle in radians is \theta = \frac{\pi}{2} - \arctan{(\frac{V}{H})} - \arcsin{ ( \frac{R}{\sqrt{V^2 + H^2} })}.
 
Stephen Tashi said:
You'd also need to enter the radius R of the pulley.
V = vertical height center of pulley above level attachment point
H = horizontal distance of center of pulley to vertical line through attachment point

I think the angle in radians is \theta = \frac{\pi}{2} - \arctan{(\frac{V}{H})} - \arcsin{ ( \frac{R}{\sqrt{V^2 + H^2} })}.

Thank you for you response! I think that is closer than what I have gotten so far. At least it is another approach. I will work on seeing if this can be adapted to define the angle based only on the amount of line let out at the winch.

I attached another approach I have thought about earlier
 

Attachments

  • Capture1.PNG
    Capture1.PNG
    94.8 KB · Views: 634
im not sure this can be solved for in terms of line let out at the winch. is this a problem for dynamic geometric modeling software? does anyone have any experience using such tools that could suggest one with a shorter learning curve?
 
Is the circle in the upper left of the picture a winch or is it just a pulley?
Which distance in the picture is "line let out of the winch"?
 
  • #10
Stephen Tashi said:
Is the circle in the upper left of the picture a winch or is it just a pulley?
Which distance in the picture is "line let out of the winch"?

thats just a pulley.

the line let out of the winch isn't directly represented in that picture, but if you could think of the line payed out at the winch, it would pass over the pulley.
in the last image I attached, you see the red line. with the load positioned all the way up, this length is known, so we can say this 'base length' + whatever the winch paid out, is the length of the red line. the blue segment is wrapped around the pulley as the load descends. that's how I divided it up into little chewable understandable pieces, but I could be crazy!

 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K