Undergrad Rotating Molecules: Energies, Angular Momentum & Wavefunctions

  • Thread starter Thread starter kelly0303
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molecules Rotation
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the confusion surrounding the rotational motion of molecules, particularly regarding the rigid rotor model and the differences between the center of mass (CM) frame and the lab frame. While the energy formula in the CM frame is given by ##BJ(J+1)##, the energy may differ in the lab frame due to the translational motion of the center of mass. The wavefunctions, represented as spherical harmonics, are frame-independent but their mathematical expressions vary with the chosen representation. Angular momentum is defined in the CM frame by considering the relative motion of atoms, despite the molecule appearing stationary in that frame. Overall, understanding the relationship between the two frames is crucial for accurate measurements of energy and angular momentum in molecular systems.
kelly0303
Messages
573
Reaction score
33
Hello! I am a bit confused about the rotational motion in molecules. Assuming the bond length is constant, the motion can be described as a rigid rotor. In the center of mass frame the energies are given by ##BJ(J+1)## and the wavefunctions are spherical harmonics. However when we measure the energies or the angular momenta, we do it in lab frame. So I am a bit confused. Is the formula for the energy the same both in lab and CM frame? And if not, what is the formula in the lab frame? Also, is the wavefunction the same in both frames or, in other words, is the angular moment of the molecule the same in both frames. Actually I am a bit confused about how is the angular momentum defined in the CM frame. Isn't the molecule stationary in that frame? Yet the wavefunctions in the CM frame (spherical harmonics) do show a clear angular momentum dependence. Can someone help me clarify these things? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kelly0303 said:
However when we measure the energies or the angular momenta, we do it in lab frame. So I am a bit confused. Is the formula for the energy the same both in lab and CM frame? And if not, what is the formula in the lab frame?
Should the energy be frame dependent?

kelly0303 said:
Also, is the wavefunction the same in both frames or, in other words, is the angular moment of the molecule the same in both frames.
The wave function is the wave function and is independent of any representation. However, its mathematical expression will differ dependent on the choice of representation (just like for the comparison between its representation in momentum space compare to position space).

kelly0303 said:
Actually I am a bit confused about how is the angular momentum defined in the CM frame. Isn't the molecule stationary in that frame?
No, because what you separate is the translation of the center of mass. You then get a Hamiltonian corresponding to the relative displacement of the atoms (vibrations) and the overall orientation of the molecular frame (rotations).

Note that there are three rotational quantum numbers: the total angular momentum ##J##, the projection of the total angular momentum on the z axis is the lab frame, ##M_J##, and the projection of the total angular momentum on the z axis is the molecule frame, ##K##. (The latter is not used for linear molecules, such as diatomic molecules, where only ##K=0## is possible.)
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
683
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K