Rotating planet moving through space

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bofors
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planet Rotating Space
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a rotating planet moving through space, focusing on the forces involved in the acceleration and deceleration of objects on its surface. Participants explore concepts related to centripetal force, gravity, and the implications of rotational motion in various contexts, including everyday examples and theoretical scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the total linear velocity of an object on a rotating planet as a combination of the planet's velocity through space and the object's rotational velocity, questioning the source of the forces causing acceleration and deceleration.
  • Another participant suggests that the forces involved include gravity and the normal force, which together provide the necessary centripetal force for rotation.
  • Some participants argue that neither gravity nor centripetal force can cause tangential acceleration or deceleration, leading to a discussion about the nature of forces acting on rotating objects.
  • A later reply emphasizes that centripetal force is sufficient to change the direction of velocity in uniform circular motion, even if the magnitude remains constant.
  • One participant acknowledges a misunderstanding regarding tangential acceleration, clarifying that their original scenario involved a fixed tangent direction related to the planet's motion through space.
  • Another participant introduces an analogy involving a spinning tea cup on a moving train, suggesting it illustrates the effects of rotational motion combined with linear motion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of forces in causing acceleration and deceleration in rotating systems. There is no consensus on the nature of these forces or their implications for objects in motion.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on specific interpretations of forces and motion, which may depend on the definitions used. The discussion includes unresolved questions about the relationship between tangential and centripetal forces in the context of rotation.

Bofors
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
Its velocity, Vp, is towards some other part of the universe, It rotates in the same plane as its direction of travel. The linear velocity of an object on the surface of the planet relative to the centre is Vr. That means the object's total linear velocity is Vp+Vr when it's at one point in its path, and Vp-Vr when it's directly opposite. That means it's accelerating and decelerating. But where is the force that causes that? (I know there's a flaw in my reasoning somewhere, but I can't spot it).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bofors said:
But where is the force that causes that?

That's the sum of gravity and (electromagnetic) normal force.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
DrStupid said:
That's the sum of gravity and (electromagnetic) normal force.

Specifically the forces that make a solid a solid. You can ask this same question about any rotating solid object on earth. Or Earth itself. We are being pushed toward the sun at sunrise and away from the sun at sunset. What caused the acceleration?
 
Bofors said:
That means it's accelerating and decelerating. But where is the force that causes that?
The combination of gravity and the normal force. In other words, the centripetal force.

Edit: @DrStupid and @RPinPA for the win!
 
Thanks for the replies. But so far as I'm aware, neither gravity nor centripetal force can cause any acceleration or deceleration in a direction tangential to the circle of rotation.
 
Bofors said:
Thanks for the replies. But so far as I'm aware, neither gravity nor centripetal force can cause any acceleration or deceleration in a direction tangential to the circle of rotation.
We don't need to have tangential acceleration for this difference in velocities between one point and its diametrical opposite. The centripetal acceleration is enough. To see this let's examine a particle that does uniform circular motion. At one point its velocity is V and at diametrical opposite the velocity is -V . It is only the centripetal force that acts and gradually changes the direction of velocity from +V to -V (from angle ##0## to angle ##\pi## gradually passing through all the directional angles ). The magnitude of velocity remains constant, but the direction changes from ##0## to ##\pi## so it becomes -V at angle ##\pi##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bofors
Bofors said:
Thanks for the replies. But so far as I'm aware, neither gravity nor centripetal force can cause any acceleration or deceleration in a direction tangential to the circle of rotation.
You should work out the math. It will be illuminating for you. Easiest way is to use some math software.
 
Bofors said:
Thanks for the replies. But so far as I'm aware, neither gravity nor centripetal force can cause any acceleration or deceleration in a direction tangential to the circle of rotation.

Well, OK, I'll concede that in a manner of speaking.

Again, this question applies to any rotating object, including you sitting in your chair on earth. Why do you rotate with earth? What keeps you in that constantly-accelerated frame? In the case of you and the air around you, it's friction. But the cause of that friction is the normal force due to gravity.

But how about the ground under your feet? What makes it follow the rotation of the earth, again undergoing a constant acceleration? And that's why I said "everything that makes a solid a solid".

And once again I'll say all of this applies to any rotating object. If you twirl a baton from the center, why do the ends of the baton rotate? What causes them to undergo a state of constant acceleration?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bofors
Thanks again. I've thought about it some more, and I see that I made a statement that is wrong. I said "neither gravity nor centripetal force can cause any acceleration or deceleration in a direction tangential to the circle of rotation". That would be true if that tangent is seen as continually changing, but my original scenario was in relation to a fixed tangent - one pointing in the direction the whole planet is moving through space. In that fixed direction, of course, the velocity does change under centripetal force, going from +v to 0 to -v to 0 to +v...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale and Delta2
  • #10
Cant you make this even more simple and look at a spinning tea cup (like the amusement park ride) say you sitting on one side of the tea cup and the tea cup was rotating at an angular velocity of one rev/sec. say that equated to a tangential velocity of 10mph... NOW, picture the tea cup on a train track where the tea cup also has a constant velocity of 10mph. same as the planet rotating and moving through space, would the occupants feel the starting and stopping viewed from the inertial frame of reference?

example … but picture the rotating object being changed 90degrees to horizontal. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachme..._Should_Have_Speed_Changes_at_the_Surface.mp4
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K