Rotation matrix multiplied by matrix of column vectors?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the multiplication of a 2x2 rotation matrix R with a 2x3 matrix consisting of three column vectors (X0, X1, X2). Participants clarify that it is indeed possible to multiply the rotation matrix R by the 2x3 matrix, resulting in a new matrix where each column vector is individually rotated by R. The mathematical foundation for this operation is based on the rules of matrix multiplication, which allow a 2x2 matrix to be multiplied by any matrix with 2 rows, specifically any 2xn matrix.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 2D rotation matrices
  • Familiarity with matrix multiplication rules
  • Knowledge of column vector representation in matrices
  • Basic linear algebra concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of rotation matrices in 2D space
  • Learn about matrix multiplication and its dimensional requirements
  • Explore applications of rotation matrices in computer graphics
  • Investigate transformations using homogeneous coordinates
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer graphics developers, and students of linear algebra who are interested in understanding matrix operations and transformations in 2D space.

aaddcc
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hey, let's say that in 2D space we have a 2x2 rotation matrix R. Normally you could multiply this rotation matrix by a 2x1 column matrix / vector X. In that case it would be XR to get the vector rotated in the way described by R. Now what I'm wondering is, what if I had 3 column vectors that I wanted to combine and multiply column-wise. Is there a mathematical way to describe having this new matrix and doing the operation on each column individually, then putting it back into the same type of matrix?

5sanU8q.png
As in I want to multiply X0, X1, X2, individually by R but describe it in a simple way. I don't think I can say XR in this case... can I?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
in my notation i think you meant RX for X rotated by R. Then RZ, where Z is a matrix of any number of columns, is a matrix whose columns are the result of rotating all those columns by R.
 
Sorry, you are right I meant RX. Are you saying that if I have multiple vectors in one matrix, where each column is a vector, I can just multiply the rotation matrix by that matrix to rotate each individual vector? Or is there another way I'd need to do this?
 
i don't understand. are you asking me to repeat my statement? couldn't you just read it again?
 
Well it doesn't really make sense to me, because you are basically saying I can multiply a 2x2 matrix by a 2xn matrix which I don't think is possible for n>2? In my case I have a 2x3 matrix, i.e. 3 column vectors and a 2x2 rotation matrix
 
ok, in matrix multiplication AB you dot the rows of the left matrix A by the columns of the right matrix B. so a 2x2 matrix A can be multiplied by any matrix B with 2 rows, i.e. any 2xn matrix. do you agree?

in general, matrix multiplication is defined for any mxn matrix times any nxk matrix. i think i got this right. what do you think?
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K