Rotation : When will the rod slide off?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
11 replies · 4K views
AlchemistK
Messages
157
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


one fourth length of a uniform rod of mass "m" and length "l" is placed on a rough horizontal surface and it is held stationary in horizontal position by means of a light thread. The thread is then burnt and the rod starts rotating about the edge. Find the angle between the rod and the horizontal when it is about to slide on the edge. The coefficient of friction between the rod and the surface is "μ"

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I have a few more questions in a similar format, and I can't find the right way to tackle them. Could someone please point me in the right direction?

The answer as given in the book is θ= tan^-1 (4μ/13)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, after conserving energy, I got:
ω^2 = (24 g sinθ)/(7L)

where θ is the angle made by the rod with the horizontal.

On integrating, there comes a term of sinθ in the denominator and by applying the limits of θ from 0 to some angle θ, infinity comes up.

The loss in PE came out to be m*g*L*sinθ/4
The kinetic energy at any angle θ will be 1/2* I * ω^2
where I is m*(L^2)/48.
 
Last edited:
In the direction of the rod,
ma = mgsinθ - μmgcosθ
 
no

you need to find the reaction force (call it R) at the table, from the acceleration

then you check to see whether µ is capable of producing R

(when it isn't, that's the answer)​
 
tiny-tim said:
from the acceleration

Do you mean the frictional force on the table due to the rode? (μmgcosθ)

Or the normal reaction due to the component of the weight of the rod? (mgcosθ)
 
Would that be the vector sum of mgcosθ and μmgcosθ? I can't see any more forces here.
 
AlchemistK said:
Would that be the vector sum of mgcosθ and μmgcosθ? I can't see any more forces here.
tiny-tim said:
No, it's the difference of ma and mg


Aren't they numerically the same? ma - mg is equal and opposite to mgcosθ + μmgcosθ
 
@tiny tim why did we find the relation b/w omega and theta