Rotational inertia of a square piece of wood?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the rotational inertia of a square piece of plywood when using a hole saw. It highlights that the rotational inertia is influenced by factors such as the mass of the plywood, the size of the square, and the distance from the center of the square to the hole being drilled. The moment of inertia can be calculated using the formula I=(1/12)ma^2+md^2, where m is the mass, a is the side length, and d is the distance to the hole's center. The equation is derived from the parallel axis theorem and emphasizes that the rotational inertia itself does not depend on the saw's RPM. Understanding these relationships is crucial for effective cutting without slippage.
chessismyfort
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I was in the shop the other day cutting holes out of a 20inx20inx.25in piece of plywood and I noticed that the hole saw was slipping on the board (meaning that it would begin to make an unpleasant sound as the saw hit the board). I had the board clamped down and I realized that a large portion of the board was hanging of the edge. Even if the board was perfectly centered for a cut through the middle of the board (discouraged in the shop, it wastes a large amount of resources), there was too much torque on the board (it would have to be cut).
Assuming that the board wasn't clamped down, I'm wondering what the rotational inertia would be on such a piece of plywood if I was using a hole saw. I know that it would depend on the size of the hole i was cutting, the rpm of the saw, the size of the board, and the location of the cut. I'm just wondering HOW they would relate.
Use any other necessary units (mass etc.)

Is it even possible to create an equation for this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The moment of inertia (rotational inertia) of the plywood is a geometric quantity and does not depend on the rpm of the saw. The equation you are looking for is $$I=\frac{1}{12}ma^2+md^2$$where
##m##= mass of plywood,
##a##=side of square,
##d##=distance from the center of the square to the center of the hole you are about to drill.

The formula is an application of the parallel axis theorem.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top