Rotational Kinematics - angle between force and velocity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem related to rotational kinematics, specifically focusing on the angle between total acceleration and net force with respect to the car's velocity. Participants are exploring the calculations involved in determining angular displacement, angular speed, and the relationship between different types of acceleration in a circular motion context.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reports their progress on a physics problem involving a Chevrolet Corvette, providing values for angular acceleration, angular speed, radial acceleration, total acceleration, and net force.
  • Another participant suggests using kinematics equations and emphasizes the importance of using correct units for angular measurements.
  • A participant calculates angular displacement using a kinematics equation but questions whether the angle calculated represents the angle between acceleration and velocity.
  • Another participant clarifies that angular displacement is not the same as the angle between acceleration and velocity and provides a method to calculate angular speed.
  • One participant attempts to calculate the angle using a different approach but arrives at a value that does not match the expected answer from the textbook.
  • A later reply suggests using the arctangent function to find the angle between radial and tangential acceleration, providing a specific formula to apply.
  • One participant expresses appreciation for the clarification provided by the suggestion to use arctangent.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion includes multiple competing views on how to approach the problem, particularly regarding the interpretation of angular displacement and the correct method to find the angle between total acceleration and velocity. No consensus is reached on the correct interpretation or calculation method.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the definitions and relationships between angular displacement, acceleration, and velocity, indicating potential limitations in their understanding of the concepts involved.

trinkleb
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Here is the problem I am working on. I have found answers for all of them except part (f), which is the one I need help with. I will report the answers I have so far:

A classic 1957 Chevrolet Corvette of mass 1240 kg starts from rest and speeds up with a constant tangential acceleration of 2.00 m/s^2 on a circular test track of radius 60.0 m. Treat the car as a particle.

(a) What is its angular acceleration? --> 0.0333 rad/s2
(b) What is its angular speed 6.00 s after it starts? --> 0.2 rad/s
(c) What is its radial acceleration at this time? --> 2.4 rad/s2
(d) (I'll skip this one, since it's just a sketching problem)
(e) What are the magnitudes of the total acceleration and net force for the car at this time? --> atot = 3.12 m/s2 and ΣF = 3874 N

(f) What angle do the total acceleration and net force make with the car's velocity at this time?

I'm wondering if I should use one of the rotational kinematics equations, but I'm still not sure how to go about it. Any ideas would be helpful. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use your kinematics equations and substitute the variables. v=omega, alpha=a or acceleration, time=time, delta(x)=delta(theta).

Then solve as though kinematics. Use correct units: rad/s rad/s^2 instead of m/s etc. If you need more help, let me know.
 
This is what I did using a kinematics equation:

Θ = Θo + ωozt + 1/2(αzt2

Since it starts from rest,

Θ = 1/2(0.0333 rad/s2)(6 s)2
Θ = 0.594 rad = 107°

This is not the right answer. Does Θ really represent the angle between the acceleration and the velocity? I thought it was just the angular displacement, in which I can't see a correlation between that and the acceleration and velocity angle.
 
Delta Theta is Angular displacement. Starts from rest wi=0. Time=6.00s. Alpha=0.0333 rad/s^2. You now have 3 variables. Solve for wf.

Use wf=wi+alpha(time) -----------> wf=0 + (0.0333 rad/s^2)(6.00sec) That should result in your angular speed of 0.1998 or 0.2rad/s

Foe reg kinematics Vf=Vi+at
 
Oh sorry, for part (f) try

Delta Theta = ((wi+wf)/2 ))(time) wi+wf, divide by 2, multiply by time
 
Alright, so when I use that equation I get:

ΔΘ = ½(ωo + ωf)(t)
ΔΘ = ½(0 + 0.2 rad/s)(6 s) = 0.6 rad = 34.4°

The book says it should be 50.2°, which doesn't make sense to me. Is there a certain concept that I might be missing which could be keeping me from getting the right answer?
 
You need to use Arctan(ar/at). Try looking up Linear Acceleration in rigid body rotation in your textbook. atan=dv/dt = (r)(dw/dt)=ra

Tan^-1(2.40/2.00) =50.19 deg
 
Oh wow, that makes a lot of sense. Thank you so much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
757
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K