Rotational Motion and torque problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses several concepts in rotational motion and torque. It clarifies that the torque of a weight about any vertical axis is not always zero, depending on the axis's position. When a sphere rolls on a horizontal surface, points on the sphere exhibit varying vertical velocities, with the center having no vertical velocity. The validity of taking the torque of resultant forces acting on different particles is confirmed if their lines of action intersect at a common point. Additionally, in pure rolling motion, angular velocity remains independent of the distance from the axis of rotation, as the angle subtended does not depend on that distance.
Alche
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
1)The torque of the weight of anybody about any vertical axis is 0. Is it always true?

2)A sphere rolls on a horizontal surface. Is there any point of the sphere which has a vertical velocity?

3) When several forces acts on a particle we take the torque of the resultant force. Is this result valid for the force acting on different particles of a body in such a way that their lines of action intersect at a common point ?

4)In pure rolling angular velocity is independent of the distance r from the axis of rotation. Why ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Not unless the axis passes through the centre of mass.
2.yes
3.yes
4.The angle subtended doesn't depend on r & hence neither does the angular velocity.
 
Eynstone said:
1. Not unless the axis passes through the centre of mass.
2.yes
3.yes
4.The angle subtended doesn't depend on r & hence neither does the angular velocity.

Can you tell which point has vertical velocity for second question
 
Alche said:
2)A sphere rolls on a horizontal surface. Is there any point of the sphere which has a vertical velocity?

Suppose the sphere is rolling to the left. Draw a vertical line through the centre. Every point on the sphere to the right of the line is moving upward, every point to the left is moving downward. The only points on the surface that have zero vertical velocity are the point in contact with the ground, and the point directly opposite (the highest point on the surface). Edit: My bad. I should have said, any point along the vertical line will have no vertical velocity, not just the points at the extreme ends of the line.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top