Rules of Logarithms: Explained and Demystified

  • Thread starter Thread starter theojohn4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithms Rules
theojohn4
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
Hi,

So I'm doing boltzmann's entropy hypothesis.

I have a basic question about the mathematics of logarithms.

For \frac{ΔS}{K_B}=ln(W_f)-ln(W_i), I do the correct maths and go \frac{ΔS}{K_B}=ln(\frac{W_f}{W_i}), and finally take the log of the equation to get:
e^{\frac{ΔS}{K_B}}=\frac{W_f}{W_i}
This is correct, according to my worksheet.

However, I was wondering why making ln(W_f)-ln(W_i)=ln(\frac{W_f}{W_i}) is necessary in order to get the correct equation. Why can't taking the log of ln(W_f)-ln(W_i) work?

If I do it, \frac{ΔS}{K_B}=ln(W_f)-ln(W_i) is e^{\frac{ΔS}{K_B}}=W_f-W_i, which is incorrect.

What is the mathematics behind this and what am I missing? Or is it just a general rule that you have to simplify the logs in order to proceed? It's bugging me.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
hi theojohn4! :smile:

eA+B isn't the same as eA + eB

eAB isn't the same as eAeB

similary, ln(A+B) isn't the same as lnA + lnB :wink:
 
theojohn4 said:
Hi,

So I'm doing boltzmann's entropy hypothesis.

I have a basic question about the mathematics of logarithms.

For \frac{ΔS}{K_B}=ln(W_f)-ln(W_i), I do the correct maths and go \frac{ΔS}{K_B}=ln(\frac{W_f}{W_i}), and finally take the log of the equation to get:
e^{\frac{ΔS}{K_B}}=\frac{W_f}{W_i}
You're not taking the log of each side - you're exponentiating each side of the equation. That is, you are making each side the exponent of e. There's a big difference.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top