B Rutgers finds a transparent Einstein Cross - apparently a dark matter "halo".

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter .Scott
  • Start date Start date
.Scott
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
3,779
Reaction score
1,848
TL;DR Summary
Using NOEMA and ALMA in Chile, astronomers at Rutgers, New Brunswick find five images of galaxy Hers-3 in an Einstein Cross pattern, but with the central image still visible. So, apparently, gravitational lensing of something very heavy and very transparent.
The formal paper is here.

The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus.
Here is an excerpt:
Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations.

“We tried every reasonable configuration using just the visible galaxies, and none of them worked,” said Keeton, also a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy and a co-author of the study. “The only way to make the math and the physics line up was to add a dark matter halo. That’s the power of modeling. It helps reveal what you can’t see.”

I find it interesting because this single observation eliminates some of the wilder "theories" about the nature of dark matter.
And I wouldn't be surprised if it eventually allows us to further characterize dark matter.
 
Space news on Phys.org
.Scott said:
I find it interesting because this single observation eliminates some of the wilder "theories" about the nature of dark matter.
I think you underestimate the enormous retrospective adaptability that these "theories" have always demonstrated.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes javisot and .Scott
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top