Safe to remove inner wall of pond or will it burst?

  • Thread starter Thread starter peter2108
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pond Wall
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the safety of removing the inner wall of a fishpond constructed with interlocking wooden blocks. The pond measures 2.4m by 1.6m and is raised 0.4m above ground. Calculations indicate that the total force on the long side of the pond is approximately 1883 N, with a pressure of 784 Pa acting on the wall. The consensus is that removing the inner wall could compromise the structural integrity of the outer wall, especially if the construction quality of the interlocking blocks is questionable.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hydrostatic pressure principles
  • Familiarity with structural integrity concepts
  • Basic knowledge of physics equations related to force and pressure
  • Experience with interlocking wooden block construction techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research hydrostatic pressure calculations in fluid mechanics
  • Study structural failure modes in retaining wall designs
  • Examine best practices for constructing and maintaining wooden ponds
  • Learn about the properties and longevity of pressure-treated wood
USEFUL FOR

Pond owners, structural engineers, and anyone involved in aquatic landscaping or construction seeking to understand the implications of modifying pond structures.

peter2108
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Safe to remove inner wall of pond or will it burst??

1.Problem
I have a fishpond. It is raised 0.4m above the ground, the wall being interlocking wooden blocks. The blocks are all locked together all the way round so they could be picked up and put down somewhere else. The pond is 2.4m long by 1.6m. In fact the bounding wall is double skinned, the inner wall is connected to outer by a buttreses.I don't think the inner wall is needed. I would like to remove it. But is the force on the walls enough to make this imprudent.The guy selling the blocks originally said you needed a double skin. ... but he would wouldn't he?

Can I remove the inner wall safely? Might the wall burst?

Homework Equations


After removing inner wall total force on long side is
[itex]\int ^{h}_{0} \rho \; g \; w \; y \; dy[/itex]
where [itex]\rho[/itex] is density of water, [itex]g[/itex] is acceleration due to gravity, [itex]h[/itex] is height and [itex]w[/itex] is length of wall.

The Attempt at a Solution


Well the total force on the long side is [itex]1/2 \times 1000 \times 9.81 \times 2.4 \times 0.4^{2} \ = \ 1883[/itex]. Sounds quite a lot. But the force on the North side of the wall is exactly balanced by the force in the opposite direction on the South side. So it can be ignored? Surely not. Again the length of the wall affects the total force so that a side of 24m instead of 2.4m would be under 10 times the force. But my intuition is that the length of the sides does not matter. It's all about the dam bursting and that seems to depend only the pressure which is [itex]1883/2.4 \ = \ 784[/itex]. But how to interpret this? I think if I divide by [itex]g[/itex] I get the "weight" of the water pressing on the wall which would be [itex]784/9.81 \ = \ 79[/itex]. I think that is far too high. So now I am puzzled.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Without diving into your analysis, you need to know the conditions that would make the outer wall fail if the inner wall was removed. How close would you be to the failure condition? How comfortable are you with being that close? Be advised that the outer wall will fail at its weakest link--how uniformly constructed are these interlocking wooden blocks? How long do you expect this structure to last? Even pressure-treated wood is a semi-permanent solution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
18K
Replies
4
Views
3K