Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the need for an independent review of safety PLC code for a significant piece of capital equipment. Participants are seeking recommendations for companies or professionals who can provide this service, particularly in the context of ensuring safety compliance and certification.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant is looking for an independent reviewer for safety PLC code, emphasizing the importance of safety due to the equipment's value and the end users' qualifications.
- Another participant suggests searching for Professional Engineers specializing in software review, providing a link to a relevant professional organization.
- A participant expresses the need for a company that can offer certification, highlighting the challenges associated with ensuring safety for equipment used by individuals with varying educational backgrounds.
- A participant shares a link to a company that provides functional safety services and asks if others know of similar providers.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally agree on the need for an independent review and certification of safety PLC code, but there are varying opinions on the best approach and potential resources available.
Contextual Notes
Some limitations include the specific requirements for certification and the qualifications of the reviewers, which may depend on the nature of the equipment and the regulatory environment.
Who May Find This Useful
Professionals involved in safety engineering, manufacturing, and compliance, particularly those working with safety PLC systems and capital equipment.