MHB Sameer's derivative problem via Facebook

  • Thread starter Thread starter Prove It
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivative
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the values of \( k \) for the curve defined by the equation \( y = \frac{5}{3}x + kx^2 - \frac{8}{9}x^3 \) such that the tangents at \( x = 1 \) and \( x = -\frac{1}{2} \) are perpendicular. The gradients at these points are calculated using the derivative \( \frac{dy}{dx} = \frac{5}{3} + 2kx - \frac{8}{3}x^2 \). Setting the product of the gradients equal to -1 leads to the quadratic equation \( k(3 - 2k) = 0 \), yielding the solutions \( k = 0 \) and \( k = \frac{3}{2} \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically derivatives
  • Knowledge of the concept of perpendicular lines in geometry
  • Familiarity with quadratic equations and their solutions
  • Ability to evaluate functions at specific points
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of derivatives in finding tangents to curves
  • Explore the geometric interpretation of perpendicular lines in coordinate systems
  • Learn about quadratic equations and methods for solving them
  • Investigate the implications of tangent lines in optimization problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and geometry, as well as educators looking for practical examples of derivatives and their applications in real-world scenarios.

Prove It
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
20
For the curve with equation $\displaystyle \begin{align*} y = \frac{5}{3}\,x + k\,x^2 - \frac{8}{9}\,x^3 \end{align*}$, calculate the possible values of $\displaystyle \begin{align*} k \end{align*}$ such that the tangents at the points where $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x = 1 \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x = -\frac{1}{2} \end{align*}$ are perpendicular

We first need to remember that two lines are perpendicular when their gradients multiply to give -1.

Now, the gradients of the tangents at the points where $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x = 1 \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x = -\frac{1}{2} \end{align*}$ can be found by evaluating the derivative at those points.

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{\mathrm{d}y}{\mathrm{d}x} &= \frac{5}{3} + 2\,k \,x - \frac{8}{3}\,x^2 \\ \\ \frac{\mathrm{d}y}{\mathrm{d}x} | _{x = 1} &= \frac{5}{3} + 2\,k \cdot 1 - \frac{8}{3} \cdot 1^2 \\ &= 2\,k - 1 \\ \\ \frac{\mathrm{d}y}{\mathrm{d}x} |_{x = -\frac{1}{2}} &= \frac{5}{3} + 2\,k \cdot \left( -\frac{1}{2} \right) - \frac{8}{3} \cdot \left( -\frac{1}{2} \right) ^2 \\ &= 1 - k \end{align*}$

Now for the two tangents to be perpendicular, these gradients must multiply to -1...

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left( 2\,k - 1 \right) \left( 1 - k \right) &= -1 \\ 2\,k - 2\,k^2 - 1 + k &= -1 \\ 3\,k - 2\,k^2 &= 0 \\ k \left( 3 - 2\,k \right) &= 0 \\ k = 0 \textrm{ or } k &= \frac{3}{2} \end{align*}$
 

Attachments

  • derivative.jpg
    derivative.jpg
    24.6 KB · Views: 144
Physics news on Phys.org
Prove It said:
We first need to remember that two lines are perpendicular when their gradients multiply to give -1.

Now, the gradients of the tangents at the points where $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x = 1 \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} x = -\frac{1}{2} \end{align*}$ can be found by evaluating the derivative at those points.

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{\mathrm{d}y}{\mathrm{d}x} &= \frac{5}{3} + 2\,k \,x - \frac{8}{3}\,x^2 \\ \\ \frac{\mathrm{d}y}{\mathrm{d}x} | _{x = 1} &= \frac{5}{3} + 2\,k \cdot 1 - \frac{8}{3} \cdot 1^2 \\ &= 2\,k - 1 \\ \\ \frac{\mathrm{d}y}{\mathrm{d}x} |_{x = -\frac{1}{2}} &= \frac{5}{3} + 2\,k \cdot \left( -\frac{1}{2} \right) - \frac{8}{3} \cdot \left( -\frac{1}{2} \right) ^2 \\ &= 1 - k \end{align*}$

Now for the two tangents to be perpendicular, these gradients must multiply to -1...

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left( 2\,k - 1 \right) \left( 1 - k \right) &= -1 \\ 2\,k - 2\,k^2 - 1 + k &= -1 \\ 3\,k - 2\,k^2 &= 0 \\ k \left( 3 - 2\,k \right) &= 0 \\ k = 0 \textrm{ or } k &= \frac{3}{2} \end{align*}$
This is correct! One can also verify by finding the equations of the tangent. For instance, when ##k=0## then our tangent equations would be, ##y=x-0.222## and ##y=-x+1.778## that coincide with each other at ##90^0##. Similarly this can be done for ##k=\dfrac{3}{2}##.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
I've encountered a few different definitions of "indefinite integral," denoted ##\int f(x) \, dx##. any particular antiderivative ##F:\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}, F'(x) = f(x)## the set of all antiderivatives ##\{F:\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}, F'(x) = f(x)\}## a "canonical" antiderivative any expression of the form ##\int_a^x f(x) \, dx##, where ##a## is in the domain of ##f## and ##f## is continuous Sometimes, it becomes a little unclear which definition an author really has in mind, though...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K