Sampling at 1/n Planck Time: Synchronizing Samplers and Analyzing Data Values

Hippasos
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Can we synchronize n samplers so that the system is being sampled at 1/n Planck time?

What could we tell about the data values between two adjacent samples?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hippasos said:
Can we synchronize n samplers so that the system is being sampled at 1/n Planck time?

What could we tell about the data values between two adjacent samples?

1. Not theoretically possible.

2. Nothing, there are theorems about making assumptions between any 2 sample points. The conclusions are limited by the HUP and attempts to go past that lead to logical contradictions (and results are as predicted by QM). See Hardy's Paradox for example.
 
No, because tat would require us to sample 10^44 times/s.
Which is about 33 orders of magnitude faster than the fastest A/D converter we can currently build.
 
Is this thread referring to the Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem of band-limited functions? I believe that most QM wave functions have a limited bandwidth (if they spatially limited then they are usually limited in momentum-space also).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top