Satellite Burning: Why Does It Occur?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Himal kharel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Satellite
AI Thread Summary
Satellites burn upon re-entry due to their high velocity, typically around 25,000 mph, which generates intense heat from atmospheric friction. During launch, rockets do not reach such speeds until they are well above the dense atmosphere, and they are protected within aerodynamic structures. The atmosphere helps slow down objects in low Earth orbit, preventing space debris accumulation by ensuring they eventually re-enter and burn up. Low orbiting satellites, like the Space Station and Hubble, require periodic boosts to maintain their altitude. The discussion highlights the differences in atmospheric interaction during ascent and descent, emphasizing the critical role of speed and protection.
Himal kharel
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Why does a satellite burns if it falls from orbit to atmosphere? BUT not when it is launched ffrom surface to orbit, ALTHOGH they pass through the same atmosphere
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Himal kharel said:
Why does a satellite burns if it falls from orbit to atmosphere? BUT not when it is launched ffrom surface to orbit, ALTHOGH they pass through the same atmosphere
Going up, it does not reach a very high velocity until well out of the atmosphere.
Coming down, there is nothing to slow it down from its 25,000mph speed except the atmo shockwave.

Also, going up, it is aerodynamically sound inside a rocketship, whereas coming down it is not protected and covered in delicate equipment.
 
When an object is put into orbit, a lot of that speed is obtained after the object has gone past the main part of the atmosphere. Since the ratio of fuel to payload is so high to get an object into orbit, even objects like the Space Shuttle rely on the atmosphere to slow them down again as opposed to carrying so much fuel that they can slow down to nearly the speed they used when going through the atmosphere.

Most low orbiting objects are in the next to outer layer of atmosphere called the thermosphere. The atmosphere there is very thin, but just enough to slow a low orbiting object down so that it eventually burns up in the lower layers of the atmoshpere, and this provides a way to keep from cluttering low Earth oribital area's with space junk. In the case of the space station and the Hubble telescope, these need an occasional boost from space shuttles (there may be a robotic space vehicle used to do the last Hubble service) in order to maintain their orbit.

The speed of most of these low orbit objects is around 17,500 mph. The fastest rentry speed of a manned spacecraft was Apollo 10, something like 24,790 mph. Fastest unmanned reenty of a man made satellite was a sample return capsule from Stardust, 29,000 mph (it used parachutes similar to the old Apollo missions for a safe "landing").
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top