Satellite travelling away from Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter scottlawsonbc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Satellite
AI Thread Summary
A satellite accelerating away from Earth at 20% the speed of light, increasing to 90% at 2% per hour, would experience delays in receiving temperature data due to relativistic effects. As the satellite accelerates, the frequency of the data pulses would be affected by the relativistic Doppler effect, causing additional delays beyond the one-second interval. Once the satellite reaches a constant speed, the data transmission would stabilize, but the initial acceleration would still impact the timing of received signals. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately interpreting the data sent back to Earth. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering relativistic effects in satellite communication.
scottlawsonbc
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If a satellite was traveling away from Earth at a constant rate of acceleration, starting at 20% speed of light, and increasing by 2% speed of light per hour until it reached 90% speed of light, sending temperature data back at intervals of one second, how would it be received on Earth?

While accelerating, would it be received on every second? Or would their be an additional delay between each pulse because of the acceleration and velocity? What happens when the satellite reaches a constant speed?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



If a train is coming towards you, the sound waves are closer together than if the train was speeding away from you. I don't know if this can also be observed with pulses of information traveling at the speed of light.

My guess is that you would have to have some additional delay to the one second pulses because of the acceleration, but I really don't know if the light behaves in the same manner.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You may want to think (or read) about relativistic Doppler.
 
Filip Larsen said:
You may want to think (or read) about relativistic Doppler.

That is very helpful, thank you
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top