Count Iblis
- 1,858
- 8
Good that there were no jet planes when http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Garita_Caldera"
Last edited by a moderator:
Correction #1: People from right next door to Virginia. Elected officials only; plain old ordinary citizens don't count.mgb_phys said:The US could do more to help though - can't you pacify volcanoes by throwing people from Virginia into them?
brewnog said:Rubbish. I was supposed to be going to Ireland for the weekend. Booo!
No, that was New ZealandFrame Dragger said:@BobG: I had no idea either, but apparently that's where the Lord of The Rings movies were filmed.
In Iceland? - occasional volcanoes and the ever present danger of Bjork encounters.Anyway, like California, isn't there always a big catch to that kind of natural beauty? :yikes:
mgb_phys said:No, that was New Zealand
In Iceland? - occasional volcanoes and the ever present danger of Bjork encounters.
in New Zealand - no volcanoes and even the sheep are pretty tame.
Right, New Zealand = tastey lamb and people who will hang you by your ankles if you compare them to flightless birds. Iceland = "Uh.. didn't you know, that uh, Iceland is GREEN, and uh, Greenland ICEY. SHAZAM!" from a 15 year old. mgb_phys said:in New Zealand - no volcanoes and even the sheep are pretty tame.
zoobyshoe said:You could be pecked by a kiwi, though.
Borek said:
Borek said:
Well compared to the island next door, where even the sheep are venomous.Frame Dragger said:EDIT: Oh, and mgb... why are the sheep tame? What have you been doing to the poor... lambs?! "Tame" or "Tramatized"?![]()
Count Iblis said:Can propellor planes fly safely throught the ash?
mgb_phys said:Well compared to the island next door, where even the sheep are venomous.
Oh, New Zealand does have a few volcanoes but they are relatively polite and well behaved.
Cute note at the bottom of the NZ geological survey's web page
They have a link for questions, but note that "The Institute cannot determine exactly when the next eruption will occur"
mgb_phys said:Most large propeller planes are turbo-props so have exactly the same engine as 'jets'.
However the ash is mostly at 20-30,000 ft so it's perfectly safe for anything to fly under it, small planes, turboprops, jets and helicopters.
But it's risky if you have to climb or descend through the cloud, or if the cloud moves - and you don't want to be the one explaining to the lawyers of a 747 full of victims why you ok'ed it.
The glide ratio of a 747 is 1:15 -so giving you about a 100mi glide from cruise altitude (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ba_flight_9)Frame Dragger said:given the glide ratio of a 747 being somewhere between a brick and a brick with wings.![]()
cristo said:Surely you can get to Ireland without flying!
mgb_phys said:The glide ratio of a 747 is 1:15 -so giving you about a 100mi glide from cruise altitude (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ba_flight_9)
Better than helicopters which seem to turn into wood chippers at the slightest provocation.
Borek said:I have just seen sunset - red, but not unusually red. I was driving home, got here about 5 minutes too late to take pictures.
For comparison, material ejected:Borek said:...
I wonder - do we know of a plot of number of volcanic eruptions and amount of ash ejected in the past? Yes, I am thinking about the subject that we can't discuss. Was the average amount of ash flying in the last 50 years different from the average? I don't want to start a discussion, but if someone can fill my curiosity, that'll be great.
mheslep said:For comparison, material ejected:
Recent:
Mount St Helens: 1.2 km^3
Pinatubo: 10 km^3
Past epics:
Yellowstone Caldera: 1000 km^3
Toba, Indonesia: 2800 km^3
La Garita Caldera: 5000 km^3
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caldera
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinatubo
Andre said:The biggest recent event was Mt Tambora in 1815, 160 km3.