Scaling Cake Baking Times

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter erobz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of scaling baking times when adapting a cake recipe from a rectangular pan to round pans. Participants explore the underlying physical principles of heat transfer and baking chemistry, considering how these factors influence baking outcomes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests a model that neglects thermal gradients and assumes convection, proposing that baking time consists of reaching a critical temperature followed by a phase transformation involving gas bubble formation and structural changes.
  • Another participant questions the depth of the cakes, indicating that as long as the depth is similar, baking results should be comparable, and discusses the volume and surface area relationships between rectangular and round pans.
  • There is curiosity about the baking chemistry and whether the concept of latent energy at a critical temperature is an oversimplification of the actual processes involved.
  • Several participants express humor and skepticism about the practicality of the proposed model, particularly in relation to cupcake baking times.
  • A participant plans to use digital temperature probes to investigate latent heat signatures during baking, raising questions about the setup and accuracy of the measurements.
  • Another participant suggests writing down the governing equations of heat transfer to derive a more formal understanding of the baking process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of curiosity and skepticism regarding the proposed models and methods. There is no consensus on the best approach to predict baking times or the validity of the underlying assumptions about heat transfer and baking chemistry.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of baking chemistry and the potential limitations of their models, including assumptions about thermal gradients and the effects of probe placement during temperature measurements.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those involved in baking, culinary science, or anyone curious about the physics of cooking and heat transfer processes.

erobz
Gold Member
Messages
4,459
Reaction score
1,846
I have a recipe that was a scratch cake of my grandmothers, but it is made for a ## 9 ~\text{in} \times 13 ~\text{in} ## baking pan. I wish to bake three ## 9 ~\text{in} ## rounds from the recipe. I can look up baking times online for the size, but times are dependent somewhat on the recipe.

Just for fun I wanted to see what a model would predict.

I was thinking very basically to neglect thermal gradients (lumped capacitance - likely bad approximation for a cake, but still...), and assume convection. Then I suspect there is some critical temperature that is reached, and then bubbling of gases and structural change would act like a latent heat. Such that a prescribed bake time at 350 F would be comprised of a time to reach some critical temperature (via sensible heat), then the remaining bake time would be in effect a phase transformation; formation of gas bubbles, evaporation, cake structure, etc...

Any thoughts?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Philip Koeck
Science news on Phys.org
What is the depth of your off-recipe cakes versus the depth of the recipe cake?

Presumably, a cake's geographical centre will cook from top and bottom, not so much from edges in. Effectively, I'm looking at the cake as an infinite sheet, with no confounding edge effects to worry about. So, as long as the depth is similar, you should get similar results.
 
DaveC426913 said:
What is the depth of your off-recipe cakes versus the depth of the recipe cake?

Presumably, a cake's geographical centre will cook from top and bottom, not so much from edges in. Effectively, I'm looking at the cake as an infinite sheet, with no confounding edge effects to worry about. So, as long as the depth is similar, you should get similar results.
I would just generalize that if in the rectangular pan we have ##V = abc##, (##c## being the height dimension)then in each cylindrical pan we have ## \frac{1}{3} abc = \frac{\pi D^2 c'}{4} ##, so ##c'## ( the batter depth in each round pan) is fixed. The surface areas can be expressed in terms of ##a,b,c,D## (all known - measurable).

That part isn't really an issue. I'm more curious to see what the baking chemistry physical model is generally understood to be? It for sure seems complex, but it seems to me like there is effectively some kind of latent energy at some critical temperature as the cake structure forms. Is it a gross underestimation of reality?
 
Last edited:
erobz said:
Any thoughts?
a) I don't want to eat the first one.
b) I would see if your model correctly predicts cupcake baking time.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and erobz
Vanadium 50 said:
a) I don't want to eat the first one.
b) I would see if your model correctly predicts cupcake baking time.
A) Unfortunately the unsuspecting party goers will.
B)The cupcake idea is good!

Anyone know the surface area of a cupcake shell off hand? 😉
 
Last edited:
erobz said:
The cupcake idea is good!
I do this for a living, after all. Just not with cake. But if the answer is "cook for 150 years in a 2 degree oven" for cupcakes, I would definitely be more concerned than if the model got it right.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and erobz
Vanadium 50 said:
I do this for a living, after all. Just not with cake. But if the answer is "cook for 150 years in a 2 degree oven" for cupcakes, I would definitely be more concerned than if the model got it right.
That being said...would you let me suffer through experimentation with no real hope...I don't know. :smile: However, I'm going take this as "it's not the most half-baked idea" you've pondered.
 
erobz said:
"it's not the most half-baked idea" you've pondered.
That remains to be seen, doesn't it? :smile:
 
Vanadium 50 said:
That remains to be seen, doesn't it? :smile:
I need to petition the government for funds...so it might be a while.
 
  • #10
So, I gather "experimentally" I'm going to put a few digital temperature probes into a round cake and look for the signature of a latent heat (a zero temp change for some period of time). What do I need to know about the digital thermometers?

I'm thinking this one a ThermoPro TP20 off amazon with the following relevant specs:

  • 2 Probes Monitor: Wireless meat thermometer for grilling and smoking features food-grade stainless steel probes with step-down tip design allow users to get readings more precisely and quickly, acurrate to 1.8°F; Probe wires can withstand up to 716°F
  • displays both food and oven temps simultaneously with built-in backlight, say goodbye to the tedious setup steps
I'm guessing one probe measures oven temp, the other the food, but I should be able to just verify oven temp and use both in cake simultaneously. It won't be a waste because I don't have one, and probably should!

Questions/Concerns: I'm going to have to make some kind of a bracket to hold the probes so they are suspended in the mixture. Perhaps this is a destructive test, as the probes are probably significantly longer than the cake depth. Does having significant portion of probe exposed to ambient oven effect the output, or is the measurement done in the tip?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Write down the equations that govern the heat transfer behavior at the surface as well as within the cake, and then reduce the equations to dimensionless form. This will give you your answer.
 
  • #12
Chestermiller said:
Write down the equations that govern the heat transfer behavior at the surface as well as within the cake, and then reduce the equations to dimensionless form. This will give you your answer.
It initially feels out of my league. I'll try to think it over.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K