Scanning Tunnelling Microscope

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on a problem involving a scanning tunneling microscope (STM) where the tip is positioned 1.0 nm from a conducting surface with a potential difference of dV = 0.03 V. The tunneling current increases by 50%, leading to a calculated change in tip-to-surface distance of dx = 0.02 nm. However, there is a discrepancy with the provided solution, which states the answer is -0.02 nm. The confusion arises from the definition of dx and the relationship between tunneling probability and distance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum tunneling principles
  • Familiarity with scanning tunneling microscope (STM) operation
  • Knowledge of work function and its significance in tunneling
  • Proficiency in logarithmic and exponential functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of tunneling probability in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of work function in STM applications
  • Explore advanced topics in scanning tunneling microscopy techniques
  • Investigate the effects of varying potential differences on tunneling current
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in nanotechnology, quantum mechanics, and materials science, will benefit from this discussion.

ZedCar
Messages
353
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



The tip of a scanning tunnelling microscope is placed 1.0 nm away from a conducting surface and a potential of dV = 0.03 V is applied to the surface relative to the tip. When the tip is moved laterally to a new position on the surface the tunnelling current increases by 50%. What is the change in the tip to surface distance (in nm)? The work function of the tip and the surface are both 4.0 eV.
(a) –0.15 (b) 0.0 (c) +0.15 (d) –0.02 (e) +0.02


Homework Equations



Tunnelling probability P

P ~ exp(-2αx)

and

α = { (2me(ϕ-dV))^0.5 } / (h-bar)

I calculate α to be 1.025 x 10^10 which is correct.

Then I use :

|Below is x sub 2, and x sub 1|

P2 / P1 = exp(-2αx2) / exp(-2αx1)

1.5 below is due to 50% in question.

1.5 = exp(2αdx)
log(1.5) = 2αdx
dx = 2.0 x 10^-11
dx = 0.02nm

So answer (e).

However, the solution is given as answer (d).

So either there is a problem in the signs I have attributed to the powers in the exp terms when calculating P2/P1. Or the given solution is incorrect and I have the correct answer.

Was wondering if anyone could clarify?

Thank you.


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
ZedCar said:
P ~ exp(-2αx)

P2 / P1 = exp(-2αx2) / exp(-2αx1)

1.5 = exp(2αdx)

dx = 0.02nm

Note that you've defined dx to be equal to x1 - x2 according to the expressions above. But the "change in x" would normally be defined as (xfinal-xinitial) = x2 - x1

An increase in tunneling probability corresponds to a decrease in tip-to-surface distance x.
 
TSny said:
Note that you've defined dx to be equal to x1 - x2 according to the expressions above. But the "change in x" would normally be defined as (xfinal-xinitial) = x2 - x1

An increase in tunneling probability corresponds to a decrease in tip-to-surface distance x.

Thanks very much TSny!

I see where I was going wrong now!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K