Did Historical Scientists Also Excel in Cooking?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stephen Tashi
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the historical relationship between famous scientists and cooking, particularly before the 1800s. It highlights that during this period, societal norms typically placed cooking as a female domain, while scientific pursuits were dominated by men. This cultural divide limited opportunities for scientists to engage in cooking, as most did not prepare their own meals. The conversation references Louis Pasteur, who contributed significantly to food science but did not write extensively on broader natural studies. It notes that the art of cooking has evolved into a more sophisticated practice in modern times, with historical cooking literature largely disconnected from scientific figures. The dialogue also touches on the trend of modern chefs, like Heston Blumenthal, incorporating scientific principles into cooking, particularly through molecular gastronomy, and mentions how scientists during the Manhattan Project engaged in cooking as a social activity. Overall, the thread reflects on the historical context of cooking and science, suggesting a gradual blending of the two fields in contemporary culinary practices.
Stephen Tashi
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Messages
7,864
Reaction score
1,602
Were any famous scientists of the past (say 1800's or earlier) also avid cooks?

I'm curious about this because there have long been cookbooks and the descriptions in cookbooks are concise and step-by-step. But a cookbook is associated with tasks that a Natural Philosopher might regard as less sophisticated than the study of nature. (Even today, a "cookbook approach" has some negative connotations.) However, a scientist who was also a cook might embrace the cookbook style of describing things. Are there any examples?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No.

At the time, scientists were male, cooks were female. Also people didn't cook for themselves, except the poor, in which case they usually hadn't the chance to become a scientist.
 
Demands the old joke: What's the difference between chemistry and cookery?

In chemistry, it's not a good idea to lick the spoon.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes marcusl, DennisN and DrClaude
Louis Pasteur had a lot to do with food and drink, but I haven't found anything he wrote about the study of nature in general.
 
Stephen Tashi said:
Louis Pasteur had a lot to do with food and drink, but I haven't found anything he wrote about the study of nature in general.
Pasteur, 1822 -1895

The more we go back in history, the more we end up at times when people were happy if there was something to eat at all. The art of cooking is a rather modern culture. There are some old French books with recipes, however, not related to scientists.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
fresh_42 said:
No.

At the time, scientists were male, cooks were female. Also people didn't cook for themselves, except the poor, in which case they usually hadn't the chance to become a scientist.

If you think of all of the great chefs that ever existed, the overwhelming majority of them were in fact male. And in certain cultures (Italians, Chinese, etc.) it was quite common for men to be involved in cooking/preparing meals.
 
Last edited:
fresh_42 said:
Pasteur, 1822 -1895

The more we go back in history, the more we end up at times when people were happy if there was something to eat at all. The art of cooking is a rather modern culture. There are some old French books with recipes, however, not related to scientists.

First of all, the more you go back in history, the more you end up at times when the majority of the population were farmers, peasants, or serfs who were not permitted or didn't have the resources to be educated. Or you came from nomadic hunter/gatherer or herder societies, and these societies generally speaking did not engage in the scientific enterprise for obvious reasons.
 
StatGuy2000 said:
If you think all of the great chefs that ever existed, the overwhelming majority of them were in fact male.
I would substitute "great" with "famous."
<Unrelated comment veering into politics removed by mentor.>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If we relax both the famous and the past part, we get Nathan Myhrvold with bon mots like "The three most useful machines are the water bath for cooking sous vide, the centrifuge and the homogenizer."
 
  • Like
Likes Stephen Tashi
  • #10
collinsmark said:
I would substitute "great" with "famous."
<Response to deleted content removed by mentor.>
Edit: There seems to be a sort of converse trend of chefs trying to make their cooking chemistry- based using molecular structure to produce customized flavors. I remember a US-based Spain-born chef, one who set up gastro pubs but I can't remember his name; will look it up.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
WWGD said:
Edit: There seems to be a sort of converse trend of chefs trying to make their cooking chemistry- based using molecular structure to produce customized flavors. I remember a US-based Spain-born chef, one who set up gastro pubs but I can't remember his name; will look it up.
The famous one in the UK is Heston Blumenthal; I think he coined the phrase "molecular gastronomy". He is famous (or notorious) for things like bacon-and-egg flavoured ice cream.
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
  • #12
I have heard/read several anecdotes and memoirs that during the Manhattan Project personnel including many 'STEM' professions isolated at Los Alamos NM and other remote locations, became adept at entertaining each other including the relatively new concept in North America of outdoor barbeques (BBQ). Rumor has it that Robert Oppenheimer and Edward Teller played a mean piano while several colleagues shared culinary skills.

Cooking, like gardening and painting, requires a willingness to get your hands (and clothing) soiled. :cool:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top