MHB Scott's question at Yahoo Answers regarding optimization with constraint

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Scott said:
An athletic field is to be built in the shape of a rectangle x units long capped by semicircular regions of radius r at the two ends?

The field is to be bounded by a 400 meter running track. What values of x and r will give the rectangle the largest possible area?

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Scott:

The objective function (that which we wish to optimize) is the area of the rectangle, and is as follows:

$$f(r,x)=2rx$$

And if we let $P$ be the perimeter of the field, we may state the constraint:

$$g(r,x)=2x+2\pi r-P=0$$

Now, we have two ways to proceed. The first is to solve the constraint for one of the two variables $r$ or $x$, and then substitute into the objective function so that we have a function in one variable and then optimize by differentiation. Sol if we solve the constraint for $r$, we obtain:

$$r=\frac{P-2x}{2\pi}$$

And the substituting into the objective function, we obtain:

$$f(x)=2\left(\frac{P-2x}{2\pi}\right)x=\frac{x(P-2x)}{\pi}$$

Now, at this point we see we have a quadratic function opening downwards and we could use a precalculus technique to find the maximum value. We see the roots are:

$$x=0,\,\frac{P}{2}$$

We know then that the axis of symmetry lies midway between these roots, and so the axis of symmetry is at :

$$x=\frac{P}{4}$$

And so we have:

$$r=\frac{P-2\left(\frac{P}{4}\right)}{2\pi}=\frac{P}{4\pi}$$

Now, let's try differentiation. Recall:

$$f(x)=\frac{x(P-2x)}{\pi}=\frac{1}{\pi}\left(Px-2x^2\right)$$

Hence, differentiating with respect to $x$, and equating the result to zero to obtain the critical value(s), we obtain:

$$f'(x)=\frac{1}{\pi}\left(P-4x\right)=0\implies x=\frac{P}{4}$$

And like before, we find:

$$r=\frac{P}{4\pi}$$

We see also that:

$$f''(x)=-\frac{4}{\pi}<0$$

Since the objective function is concave down everywhere, we know the critical value is at the global maximum.

Now, let's examine a multivariable method: Lagrange multipliers. Recall, we have:

The objective function:

$$f(r,x)=2rx$$

Subject to the constraint:

$$g(r,x)=2x+2\pi r-P=0$$

Hence, we obtain the system:

$$2x=\lambda(2\pi)$$

$$2r=\lambda(2)$$

Hence, this implies:

$$\lambda=\frac{x}{\pi}=r$$

Substituting for $r$ into the constraint, we obtain:

$$2x+2\pi\left(\frac{x}{\pi}\right)-P=0$$

$$4x=P$$

$$x=\frac{P}{4}\implies r=\frac{P}{4\pi}$$

So, given that the objective function is zero for $x=0$, we may conclude that this critical point is at a maximum.

Thus, we have shown in various ways that:

$$f_{\max}=f\left(\frac{P}{4},\frac{P}{4\pi}\right)$$

Using the given value $P=400\text{ m}$, we then may conclude that the rectangular portion of the field is maximized for:

$$x=\frac{400\text{ m}}{4}=100\text{ m}$$

$$r=\frac{400\text{ m}}{4\pi}=\frac{100}{\pi}\text{ m}$$

This means that the straight portions of the track are equal in length to the curved portions.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top