MHB Scott's question at Yahoo Answers regarding optimization with constraint

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on optimizing the area of a rectangular athletic field capped by semicircles, constrained by a 400-meter running track. The objective function for the area is defined as f(r,x)=2rx, with the perimeter constraint given by g(r,x)=2x+2πr-P=0. Through various methods, including substitution and differentiation, it is determined that the optimal dimensions occur when x equals 100 meters and r equals 100/π meters. Both the quadratic function analysis and Lagrange multipliers confirm that these values yield the maximum area. The findings indicate that the straight portions of the track are equal in length to the curved portions.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Scott said:
An athletic field is to be built in the shape of a rectangle x units long capped by semicircular regions of radius r at the two ends?

The field is to be bounded by a 400 meter running track. What values of x and r will give the rectangle the largest possible area?

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Scott:

The objective function (that which we wish to optimize) is the area of the rectangle, and is as follows:

$$f(r,x)=2rx$$

And if we let $P$ be the perimeter of the field, we may state the constraint:

$$g(r,x)=2x+2\pi r-P=0$$

Now, we have two ways to proceed. The first is to solve the constraint for one of the two variables $r$ or $x$, and then substitute into the objective function so that we have a function in one variable and then optimize by differentiation. Sol if we solve the constraint for $r$, we obtain:

$$r=\frac{P-2x}{2\pi}$$

And the substituting into the objective function, we obtain:

$$f(x)=2\left(\frac{P-2x}{2\pi}\right)x=\frac{x(P-2x)}{\pi}$$

Now, at this point we see we have a quadratic function opening downwards and we could use a precalculus technique to find the maximum value. We see the roots are:

$$x=0,\,\frac{P}{2}$$

We know then that the axis of symmetry lies midway between these roots, and so the axis of symmetry is at :

$$x=\frac{P}{4}$$

And so we have:

$$r=\frac{P-2\left(\frac{P}{4}\right)}{2\pi}=\frac{P}{4\pi}$$

Now, let's try differentiation. Recall:

$$f(x)=\frac{x(P-2x)}{\pi}=\frac{1}{\pi}\left(Px-2x^2\right)$$

Hence, differentiating with respect to $x$, and equating the result to zero to obtain the critical value(s), we obtain:

$$f'(x)=\frac{1}{\pi}\left(P-4x\right)=0\implies x=\frac{P}{4}$$

And like before, we find:

$$r=\frac{P}{4\pi}$$

We see also that:

$$f''(x)=-\frac{4}{\pi}<0$$

Since the objective function is concave down everywhere, we know the critical value is at the global maximum.

Now, let's examine a multivariable method: Lagrange multipliers. Recall, we have:

The objective function:

$$f(r,x)=2rx$$

Subject to the constraint:

$$g(r,x)=2x+2\pi r-P=0$$

Hence, we obtain the system:

$$2x=\lambda(2\pi)$$

$$2r=\lambda(2)$$

Hence, this implies:

$$\lambda=\frac{x}{\pi}=r$$

Substituting for $r$ into the constraint, we obtain:

$$2x+2\pi\left(\frac{x}{\pi}\right)-P=0$$

$$4x=P$$

$$x=\frac{P}{4}\implies r=\frac{P}{4\pi}$$

So, given that the objective function is zero for $x=0$, we may conclude that this critical point is at a maximum.

Thus, we have shown in various ways that:

$$f_{\max}=f\left(\frac{P}{4},\frac{P}{4\pi}\right)$$

Using the given value $P=400\text{ m}$, we then may conclude that the rectangular portion of the field is maximized for:

$$x=\frac{400\text{ m}}{4}=100\text{ m}$$

$$r=\frac{400\text{ m}}{4\pi}=\frac{100}{\pi}\text{ m}$$

This means that the straight portions of the track are equal in length to the curved portions.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top