MHB Secant and Tangent Angles in Circles, finding an arc length.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the measures of angles related to secants and tangents in a circle. The user initially arrived at an incorrect arc length of 138.17 and sought clarification on the angles formed by tangents at points P and R. It was established that both angles CPQ and CRQ are 90 degrees due to the properties of tangents. The interior angles of the quadrilateral formed were analyzed, leading to the conclusion that the measure of arc PR is 100 degrees. This illustrates the relationship between angles and arc lengths in circle geometry.
Cj111
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
View attachment 8161

I got 138.17, but that isn't correct. I don't know how to do it, since the only way I thought, gave me the wrong answer. Can anyone help?
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    3.6 KB · Views: 121
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would call point $C$ the center of the circle. So, what must the measures of $$\angle CPQ$$ and $$\angle CRQ$$ be?
 
To follow up, since $$\overline{QP}$$ and $$\overline{QR}$$ are tangent to the circle, we must have $$\angle CPQ=\angle CRQ=90^{\circ}$$. Since the sum of the interior angles of a quadrilateral is $360^{\circ}$, it follows then that:

$$100x+81x-1=180\implies x=1$$

And hence, $$\overset{\frown}{PR}=100^{\circ}$$
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Back
Top