Second-Order Partial Derivative of a Parametric Function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the second-order partial derivative, d²y/dx², of a parametric function defined by r(t) = <3t² - 8t + 3, -9t² + 2t + 7>. The user correctly identifies the first derivative dy/dx as (-18t + 2) / (6t - 8) using the chain rule. However, the user struggles with the subsequent calculation of d²y/dx², which should be derived as d(dy/dx)/dx = (d(dy/dx)/dt) / (dx/dt). The correct approach involves differentiating dy/dx with respect to t and then dividing by dx/dt.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parametric equations
  • Knowledge of derivatives and the chain rule
  • Familiarity with the notation for first and second derivatives
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the chain rule in the context of parametric functions
  • Learn how to compute higher-order derivatives of parametric equations
  • Practice problems involving second-order derivatives
  • Explore applications of second-order derivatives in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on parametric equations and derivatives, as well as educators looking for examples of derivative calculations in parametric contexts.

molybdenum42
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The problem is from an online homework assignment. I know it's probably fairly simple, but my brain isn't grasping it right now for some reason.[The Problem]

We know:

r(t) = <3t2 - 8t + 3, -9t2 + 2t + 7>

And we are asked to find d2y/dx2.[Background Information]

My understanding of d2y/dx2 is that it is the second derivative with respect to x (the first derivative of the function having been with respect to both x and y).

In other words, it's broken down like this:

(d/dx)(dy/dx) = d2y/dx2
The derivative (with respect to x) of the first derivative of the parametric function, r(t), is equal to that mess on the right hand side of the equation.

[Attempt at a Solution]

So we know that:

(dy/dx) = (dy/dt) / (dx/dt) (From the textbook.)

And the above function, r(t), can be broken down into two parts:

x(t) = -9t2 + 2t + 7
y(t) = 3t2 - 8t + 3

Therefore:

(dx/dt) = 6t - 8
(dy/dt) = -18t + 2

And

(dy/dx) = (-18t + 2) / (6t - 8)So, now, here's where I feel like I'm guessing a little bit. Following that logic, would d2y/dx2 = (6) * [(-18t + 2)/(6t - 8)]? :rolleyes:
Heh, this is probably a silly question, but thanks very much in advance for any help! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
molybdenum42 said:
x(t) = -9t2 + 2t + 7
y(t) = 3t2 - 8t + 3

Therefore:

(dx/dt) = 6t - 8
(dy/dt) = -18t + 2

And

(dy/dx) = (-18t + 2) / (6t - 8)


So, now, here's where I feel like I'm guessing a little bit. Following that logic, would d2y/dx2 = (6) * [(-18t + 2)/(6t - 8)]? :rolleyes:

dy/dx is correct, but I can not follow your logic afterwards. d2y/dx2 =d(dy/dx)/dx = (d(dy/dx)/dt)/(dx/dt). Are you sure you did the derivative of the fraction correctly?



ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K