Seemingly simple integral gets complicated

  • Thread starter Thread starter EbolaPox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around evaluating the integral \int \sin{x} \sqrt{(\cos{x})^2 + 1}dx. The initial approach involved a substitution with u = \cos{x}, leading to \int \sqrt{u^2 + 1}du. Participants suggested using trigonometric substitution and integration by parts to simplify the integral further, with specific techniques including y = \sinh(t) for hyperbolic substitution. The conversation highlights the importance of recognizing the correct method for integrating \sec^3(\theta)d\theta and the utility of hyperbolic functions in calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus concepts, particularly substitution methods.
  • Familiarity with trigonometric identities and integration techniques.
  • Knowledge of hyperbolic functions and their properties.
  • Experience with integration by parts and partial fractions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to integrate \sec^3(\theta) using integration by parts.
  • Study hyperbolic trigonometric functions and their applications in calculus.
  • Explore advanced substitution techniques in integral calculus.
  • Review trigonometric identities relevant to integration problems.
USEFUL FOR

Students in AP Calculus, particularly those tackling complex integrals, as well as educators and tutors looking for effective teaching methods in calculus concepts.

EbolaPox
Messages
99
Reaction score
1
Well, I'm an AP Calculus BC student, and I always liked to get ahead, so before the year started, I went through Calc I and II. Now that I'm in the class with a 100+, I'm simply refreshing myself on the Calc II portion. My brother decided to give me a seemingly simple problem that turned out more complicated than I expected. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
Problem: Evaluate integral
\int \sin{x} \sqrt{(\cos{x})^2 + 1}dx
I decided to use substitution initially, setting u = cos x. dx = du/-sin(x), thus eliminating the sin(x) and leaving \int \sqrt{u^2 + 1}du
I then thought my best bet would be to approach this with trignometric substitution. I said tan(\theta) = u so
\sec{\theta}^2d\theta = du
\int (\sec{\theta})^2\sqrt{(\tan(\theta)} +1)dx
I then evaluated \sqrt{ (\tan{\theta})^2 +1 } = (\sec{\theta})
Thus, my integral was simplified (relatively) down to
\int (\sec{\theta})^3 d\theta
It just gets worse from there. Am I making some horrid mistake in my trignometric substitution or before or have I completely approached this incorrectly? I have more work that I've done, but I want to ensure that this is correct so far. Any help would be great. Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
try u = sinht
 
It looks a-ok so far. Just don't forget the minus sign in your first u-substitution.

Do you know how to integrate secant cubed?
 
Your brother is a smart-ass!

To integrate sec^3(\theta)d(\theta), first write it as \frac{d\theta}{cos^3(\theta)}. Now multiply numerator and denominator by cos(\theta) to get \frac{cos(\theta)d\theta}{cos^4(\theta)}= \frac{cos(\theta)d\theta}{(1-sin^2(\theta)^2}.
Let y= sin(\theta) and this becomes \frac{dy}{(1-y^2)^2} which can be done by partial fractions.
 
When I was in calculus I was taught that the only way to integrate secant cubed was by parts. Obviously this is not the case :rolleyes: .

By parts does not take too long, if you remember what to choose for u and dV!
 
To elaborate on what Fermat said, the integral can be written as:

\int\sqrt{1+x^2}\,dx

Then you can use the suggested substitution.

And speaking of parts, try using dv = sec2θ.
 
Last edited:
Thanks to everyone who replied. For some reason, I didn't think about attempting integration by parts.

Thanks to suggestsions everyone, I'll try them out. A question though, for the y = sinh(t), if I'm correct, is that hyperbolic trignometric substitution? I'm not very familiar with hyperbolic functions. I'll read up on it. Thanks to everyone. Once I get some more work done on it, I'll post again to see if I did it correctly.
 
EbolaPox said:
... A question though, for the y = sinh(t), if I'm correct, is that hyperbolic trignometric substitution? ...
Yes, that's a hyperbolic substitution. I goes like this,

\int\ \sqrt{u^2 + 1}\ du

\mbox{let } u = sinh\ t\mbox{, then,}

du = cosh\ t\ dt

carrying out the substitution,

\int\ \sqrt{sinh^2\ t + 1}\cdot cosh\ t\ dt
\int\ \sqrt{cosh^2\ t}\cdot cosh\ t\ dt
\int\ cosh^2\ t\ dt

\mbox{There is an ordinary trig identity, } cos^2 x = \frac{1}{2} (1 + cos2x)
all you have to do now is find the equivalent hyperbolic trig identity (try google), substitute, integrate, and back-substitute for x in the original integral.
 
Last edited:
Fascinating: I've never seen hyperbolic trignometry used for substitution. Thank you for elucidating on that. I''ll go study up on that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K