I think he was refering to how you very rarely reply to the comments we make on what you post but continue to post new and differant material instead.Esperanto said:Whoa, accusing me of changing topics for answering questions "off-topic"?
So far as the rense article is concerned it's just another take on the incident not an "updated" version of the story. Like what was said on the other thread(and I have no need or intention to "win" anything) they just post stories that apeal to their audience not because they are well researched or imply their own aproval of the material.
At any rate you can introduce this new piece of "evidence" regarding the pentagon attack but it just doesn't jive and doesn't do much damage to the integrity of the article that I posted. In that one article there were upclose and clear photographs of debris from the crash as well as 10 or so links to articles with eyewitness accounts of what happened. The article you posted has one really blurry low res picture and lots of conjecture by one guy who has probably never even been to the crash site.